Back to News
Market Impact: 0.85

War, inflation and Trump's tariffs have shaken the US. Why does the stock market keep going up?

DALGOOGLAMZNAAPLMETAMSFTNVDATSLA
Artificial IntelligenceInflationGeopolitics & WarElections & Domestic PoliticsMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningTechnology & InnovationTravel & Leisure
War, inflation and Trump's tariffs have shaken the US. Why does the stock market keep going up?

US equities have recovered sharply despite the Iran war, high oil prices, and renewed inflation, with the Nasdaq up 11% year to date and the Dow and S&P 500 near record highs. The article argues that investor confidence is being sustained by expectations of Federal Reserve and government backstops, a K-shaped economy, and massive AI capital spending from seven mega-cap stocks that now represent 30% of the S&P 500. It also highlights rising inflation at 3.8% in April and escalating concerns that an AI bubble could eventually trigger broad market selling.

Analysis

The market is no longer trading the macro headline; it is trading the policy backstop plus index concentration. When a narrow set of mega-cap balance sheets becomes the marginal buyer of risk assets through AI capex, breadth deteriorates while indices still levitate — a classic late-cycle tell that can persist for quarters before it breaks. That makes passive exposure look safer than it is: the benchmark is being carried by a handful of names whose fundamental outcomes are increasingly correlated through the same spending cycle. The more interesting second-order effect is that AI has become a quasi-fiscal stimulus for the private sector. Data-center and compute buildout supports semis, cloud, networking, and power infrastructure, but it also creates a crowded capital-allocation trade where every hyperscaler is racing to avoid underinvestment. That raises the probability of mispriced duration: if expected monetization slips even modestly, the market could re-rate capex-heavy winners first, then de-risk the broader growth complex through index-weighted flows. The political overlay matters mainly as a volatility catalyst, not a trend driver. Investors are assuming intervention will cap downside in crises, but that also means the asymmetry is shifting toward abrupt repricing if policy credibility breaks — especially around tariffs, energy, or Fed independence. In the near term, the cleanest upside remains in the companies selling picks-and-shovels to the AI buildout; the cleanest downside is in crowded, high-multiple names whose valuation depends on flawless execution and stable discount rates. Consensus is probably underestimating how much of the current market resilience is mechanical rather than cyclical. If the top of the market continues to outperform, that can coexist with weakening consumer demand and soft breadth for a while; the true risk is not an immediate crash but a sharp dispersion event when capex returns disappoint or rates stay higher for longer. That argues for staying long the infrastructure winners while selectively hedging the most crowded megacap exposure.