Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Did Fed Chair Jerome Powell Just Throw President Donald Trump Under the Bus Concerning Inflation?

NFLXNVDANDAQ
Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationTax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainEconomic DataInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
Did Fed Chair Jerome Powell Just Throw President Donald Trump Under the Bus Concerning Inflation?

The FOMC left the federal funds rate unchanged at the Jan. 28 meeting after three prior 25-basis-point cuts, while Chair Jerome Powell said inflation “remains somewhat elevated,” attributing much of the goods-sector inflation to President Trump’s tariffs and noting the Fed’s outlook assumes no additional tariffs. Powell signaled tariff-driven inflation should peak in the middle quarters of 2026, which supports a measured approach to further rate easing. A December 2024 Liberty Street Economics study found Trump’s 2018–19 China tariffs coincided with equity underperformance on announcement days and multi-year declines in labor productivity, employment, sales and profits, and concluded input tariffs raised domestic production costs passed to U.S. consumers. Combined, the Fed’s caution and demonstrated tariff-induced cost pressures pose a tangible headwind to equity markets and could alter investor positioning and monetary policy expectations.

Analysis

Market structure: Tariff-driven goods inflation shifts real returns toward producers with local content and away from import-heavy manufacturers and retailers. Input tariffs compress margins for OEMs (electronics, autos, appliances) and lift domestic materials/steel (NUE-style) pricing power; expect GDP drag via lower productivity and employment into mid-2026 when Powell expects tariff pass-through to peak. Cross-asset: sticky goods inflation lengthens Fed pause → term yields and USD stay higher vs consensus, equity multiples compress 5–15% on cyclical/small-cap pockets, and industrial metals/steel prices tick up. Risk assessment: Tail risks include tariff escalation or broad reciprocal measures (1–3% hit to US export volumes) and China retaliation that would amplify supply-chain shocks; Black Swan: semiconductor export controls + tariffs together force multi-year capex reallocation. Time buckets: immediate (days) = headline-driven volatility; short (weeks–months) = margin hits and inventory re-pricing; long (quarters–years) = reshoring capex + persistent price level effects. Hidden dependency: corporate pricing power — firms with >30% gross margin pass-through can survive; others will not. Trade implications: Favor long selective domestic cyclicals with protected input chains and secular winners in AI (NVDA) while trimming import-exposed retailers/hardware. Use bond/TIPS to hedge delayed rate cuts (buy 5y TIPS) and USD strength (UUP). Options: buy cost-limited downside protection on broad market (3-month put spreads 2–3% OTM sized to 0.5–1% portfolio risk) ahead of CPI/trade windows. Contrarian angles: Consensus assumes smooth Fed cuts; if tariffs keep core goods inflation 30–80bps above forecasts into H1–H2 2026, cuts will be delayed and multiples reprice lower — this is underpriced. Historical parallel: 2018–19 tariff episode produced multi-year profit softness for affected names — expect similar dispersion now. Unintended consequence: short-term reshoring could raise domestic labor and capex costs, benefiting automation/AI vendors (NVDA) while squeezing mid-cap manufacturers.