Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

AAA CLO ETFs: Should You Go For The Passive Giant JAAA Or The Active Challenger ICLO?

JAAAICLO
Interest Rates & YieldsCredit & Bond MarketsCompany FundamentalsAnalyst InsightsMonetary PolicyMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
AAA CLO ETFs: Should You Go For The Passive Giant JAAA Or The Active Challenger ICLO?

An analysis of AAA CLO ETFs recommends JAAA (passive) over ICLO (active), citing JAAA's superior risk-adjusted returns driven by greater diversification, higher liquidity, and a tighter bid-ask spread. Despite ICLO's marginally higher yield, its increased concentration and liquidity risks are deemed to outweigh any return advantage. Both funds target AAA CLOs with negligible credit risk, yet JAAA's passive approach is favored for delivering nearly identical returns with significantly lower risk exposure, leading to a 'Buy' recommendation for JAAA and a 'Hold' for ICLO.

Analysis

In the context of a high-interest-rate environment potentially nearing a pivot towards rate cuts, this analysis contrasts two AAA-rated Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO) ETFs: the passive Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and the active Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). The core finding favors JAAA for its superior risk-adjusted return profile, which is attributed to its greater diversification, higher liquidity, and a more favorable bid-ask spread. While both funds are positioned in the highest-quality tranche of CLOs with negligible credit risk, ICLO's active management delivers only a slightly higher yield, which is considered insufficient compensation for its increased concentration and liquidity risks. Consequently, JAAA's passive approach is assessed as providing nearly identical returns with a more conservative risk exposure, leading to a 'Buy' recommendation for JAAA versus a 'Hold' for ICLO.

AllMind AI Terminal

AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.

Request a Demo