Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

AST SpaceMobile and Starlink may prove friend, not foe, to these wireless stocks

ASTSTTMUSBACCAMZNVZSATSWFC
Technology & InnovationAntitrust & CompetitionAnalyst InsightsProduct LaunchesRegulation & LegislationConsumer Demand & Retail
AST SpaceMobile and Starlink may prove friend, not foe, to these wireless stocks

Citi analysts view advances by Starlink, AST SpaceMobile and other LEO satellite operators as a mild competitive threat but more likely a “win‑win” for incumbents such as AT&T, T‑Mobile and Verizon because partnerships can ease regulatory entry and extend coverage to rural areas; tangible moves include T‑Mobile’s direct‑to‑device launch with Starlink’s ~650 satellites, AST’s planned December launch of a large phased array and service for Verizon next year, and Starlink’s >8 million subscribers. The low‑Earth‑orbit broadband market is sizable (Bank of America estimates a roughly $200 billion TAM) and SpaceX’s near‑term spectrum buy (≈$20 billion from EchoStar) underscores ambitions, but Citi stresses satellites remain costlier and lower‑performing than fiber/5G (2–3x pricier in developed markets, up to 5x in emerging markets), so the likely industry outcome is complementary offerings, MVNO/add‑on models or wholesale partnerships rather than displacement of core terrestrial broadband.

Analysis

Citi analysts characterize advances by Starlink, AST SpaceMobile and other LEO operators as a mild competitive risk but more likely a "win-win" for incumbents such as AT&T, T‑Mobile and Verizon because partnerships can ease regulatory entry and extend coverage to rural areas. Tangible developments include T‑Mobile's commercial direct‑to‑device launch with Starlink's ~650 satellites, AST SpaceMobile's planned December launch of the largest commercial phased array in LEO and its promise of space‑based cellular broadband for Verizon next year, while Starlink reports more than 8 million global subscribers and Bank of America pegs the LEO TAM near $200 billion. Citi highlights that terrestrial options (fiber and 5G fixed wireless) remain superior on performance and infrastructure longevity and that satellite access carries a material price premium (2–3x in U.S./Europe, up to 5x in emerging markets). Satellite economics favor wide‑area coverage and complementarity rather than outright displacement; likely commercial outcomes are add‑on services, wholesale deals or MVNO models, though Citi warns MVNO economics may be weak and SpaceX's ~$20 billion EchoStar spectrum purchase may not by itself be disruptive. Near‑term investor sensitivities are execution and regulatory progress: ASTS's December launch is a catalyst, T‑Mobile/Starlink commercialization and pricing (T‑Mobile charges $10/month for Starlink use) will test consumer willingness to pay, and further spectrum or partnership announcements will determine whether satellites act as complements or real competitors.