Back to News
Market Impact: 0.65

‘Greatest economy ever’? The numbers behind Trump’s boasting

Economic DataTax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainFiscal Policy & BudgetElections & Domestic PoliticsLegal & LitigationRegulation & Legislation
‘Greatest economy ever’? The numbers behind Trump’s boasting

The BEA's advance estimate showed Q4 annualised real GDP at 1.4% (down from 4.4% in Q3) and full-year 2025 real GDP growth of 2.2% (versus 2.8% in 2024), with the October–November federal shutdown estimated to have subtracted about one percentage point from Q4. Labor data show a weak 2025 labor market (average +15,000 nonfarm payrolls/month versus 168,000 the prior year), a benchmark revision that erased 862,000 positions through March 2025, though January 2026 added 130,000 jobs and unemployment stood at 4.3%; the federal workforce has declined roughly 327,000 since October 2024. The Supreme Court struck down IEEPA-specific tariffs that produced an estimated $129bn through December 2025, prompting the administration to invoke Section 122 to impose a temporary 10–15% across‑the‑board tariff for 150 days (with broad exemptions); unresolved refund questions and expected litigation create material downside risk to importers, consumer prices and sectoral earnings.

Analysis

Market structure: The 10–15% across‑the‑board tariffs (150‑day Section 122 window) is a non‑linear supply shock that raises effective import costs ~9% economywide and immediately favors domestic input producers (steel: NUE, X; US chemicals) while compressing margins for import‑dependent retailers and electronics OEMs (AMZN, TGT). Logistics and container lines (ZIM, FDX, UPS) face volume risk; ports and freight rates likely fall if imports reprice downward. Bond markets will price higher near‑term inflation risk and fiscal/legal uncertainty — expect front‑end yields to reprice if CPI quickens, driving volatility in rates and FX (USD likely stronger vs CAD/MXN if Fed stays hawkish).

Risk assessment: Tail risks include courts striking down Section 122 (reversal rally) or large refund rulings that materially widen Treasury deficits (>$100bn exposure) — both could swing spreads and equities violently; retaliatory tariffs from trading partners could trigger a global growth shock. Immediate (days) volatility tied to legal filings and SOTU; short (weeks/months) hinge on July 24 congressional deadline and CPI prints; long (quarters) depends on nearshoring inertia and durable price pass‑through. Hidden dependencies: rapid supply‑chain rerouting to Mexico/SE Asia could benefit regional exporters (MXN, industrials) and mute tariff winners over 6–18 months.

More News