Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

Bernstein raises ASML stock price target on DRAM capacity growth By Investing.com

ASML
Corporate EarningsAnalyst EstimatesCompany FundamentalsTechnology & InnovationCorporate Guidance & OutlookAnalyst InsightsTrade Policy & Supply ChainArtificial Intelligence
Bernstein raises ASML stock price target on DRAM capacity growth By Investing.com

SK hynix agreed to purchase $7.97B of ASML EUV tool sets by the end of fiscal 2027, underscoring strong demand. Bernstein raised ASML's 2028 EUV shipment forecast to 92 units (from 79), bumped EPS to €50.4 (from €45.3) and lifted its price target to €1,700 (from €1,600); another shop raised targets in EUR and USD as well. ASML reported Q4 2025 EPS of €7.35 (missed by 3.03% vs €7.58) but revenue beat at €9.72B vs €9.69B, and shares are up ~99% year-over-year.

Analysis

ASML’s structural moat around EUV continues to create multi-year revenue visibility, but the real profit lever is not just new tool sales — it’s high-margin service, spare parts and retrofit work tied to large greenfield DRAM builds. As customers commit capex today for 2026–28 fabs, ASML captures multi-year annuity-like cashflows as uptime and throughput SLAs force long tails of recurring service spend and premium pricing for expedited deliveries. Second-order supply-chain effects favor firms that enable large fab builds: engineering & construction contractors, vacuum and optics suppliers, and inspection/yield vendors whose revenue rises with wafer starts and node transitions. Conversely, firms exposed to cyclical single-node tool segments face uneven demand as OEMs prioritize EUV slots; that creates a divergence in equipment cyclicality that will widen across 2026–2028. Key risks are policy and cycle driven: export controls or an incremental China restriction can convert multi-year visibility into discrete shipment delays within weeks; a DRAM demand shock would compress near-term orders and create a 12–24 month trough in equipment spending. Technological and process substitution risks (faster multi-patterning gains, alternative lithography) are low-probability near-term but remain asymmetric over several years and would materially compress ASPs and long-run unit need per wafer. The market appears to be price-setting a near-certain rollout for EUV into DRAM; that’s mostly right but partly front-runs timing and shipment execution. Tactical execution should therefore capture long-duration optionality while hedging policy/cycle timing — think financed long exposure or buy-write structures rather than naked long risk at current multiple levels.