Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Nu Holdings: Soaring NII Growth, Profitable And Cheap

FintechCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCredit & Bond Markets
Nu Holdings: Soaring NII Growth, Profitable And Cheap

Nu Holdings is accelerating Latin America expansion, lifting net interest income by 12% Q/Q to $3.3B last quarter on strong credit card and unsecured lending growth. The stock also screens as deeply undervalued at 11.8x P/E versus U.S. fintech peers and its own historical average, reinforcing upside sentiment. Overall, the combination of earnings momentum and valuation support suggests a bullish near-term setup for NU.

Analysis

NU’s discount is less about current profitability and more about the market assigning a persistent “credit-cycle tax” to fast-growing lenders in LatAm. If management can keep monetizing an enlarging deposit base while credit costs stay contained, the equity should rerate toward regional bank multiples rather than fintech-style skepticism; that creates meaningful upside because the market is still valuing the franchise as if growth and loss provisioning are mutually exclusive. The key second-order issue is that every incremental unsecured-loan dollar should deepen customer lock-in, lowering future acquisition costs and raising take-rates across cards, payments, and insurance. The setup is most interesting versus traditional incumbents like ITUB, BBDC, BSBR, and Banorte: NU doesn’t need to win the entire market, only keep pulling share from fee-heavy banks that are structurally slower and more expensive to serve. That said, the same product mix driving NII growth also increases tail risk: unsecured books can look benign for several quarters before charge-offs inflect, so the rally is vulnerable to a single bad vintage or any evidence that deposit beta is rising faster than loan yields. In the near term, the stock likely trades on the next earnings print and delinquency disclosures; over 6-18 months, the debate becomes whether NU is a compounder or just a cyclical lender with a premium growth narrative. The consensus may be underappreciating how much operating leverage remains if funding stays deposit-rich and credit normalization is gradual. What is likely overdone is the assumption that a sub-12x P/E automatically means obvious value — for a lender, the right multiple depends on loss visibility, not just growth. The main falsifiers are rising NPLs/charge-offs, slower card spend per active customer, or any sign that promotional growth is forcing weaker underwriting; if those appear, the discount is deserved and the rerating thesis breaks quickly.