Fastly trades at just 4.3x EV/NTM revenue despite 20% revenue growth, well below the 5.5-6.0x peer floor for comparable growth names. Net revenue retention accelerated from 100% to 113% over four consecutive quarters, while RPO rose 63% YoY and security revenue grew 47% YoY for the fourth straight quarter to 22% of revenue. The 9-point gross margin expansion since Q1 2025 reinforces improving fundamentals and supports a re-rating case.
The setup is less about a re-rating on headline growth and more about durability of the growth mix. A security-led revenue stream with materially higher gross margin changes the quality of the model: it increases the odds that incremental sales fall through to EBITDA faster than the market is underwriting, which can force multiple expansion before revenue growth re-accelerates. If that margin bridge proves repeatable for another 2-3 quarters, the current discount to peers becomes mechanically harder to defend because the company will screen less like a low-quality infra name and more like a compounder with embedded cross-sell optionality.
Second-order, the biggest beneficiaries are not obvious cloud peers but adjacent security and edge vendors that can piggyback on a broader platform-buying cycle. When customers increase NRR and RPO at the same time, it usually implies budget consolidation rather than isolated product wins; that is dangerous for point solutions that still rely on land-and-expand. The likely loser is any vendor selling “best-of-breed” security add-ons into the same customer base, because procurement will increasingly justify bundling decisions around platform economics and margin efficiency.
The main risk is timing: the market can stay skeptical for months if the company has one quarter of decelerating new-logo adds or a guide that looks conservative on billings. The near-term catalyst path is dense: next 1-2 quarters of security mix stability and another uptick in NRR should force sell-side revisions, while any pause in RPO growth would undercut the bull case quickly. The contrarian miss is that this may still be under-owned because investors anchor on historical execution scars; if that scar tissue heals, the stock can re-rate sharply even without a huge change in top-line growth.
I would treat this as a quality-of-earnings rerating, not just a revenue story. That means the real upside comes from margin expansion plus multiple normalization, which can compound faster than expected if the market starts capitalizing the security segment separately. But if security growth slows before the rest of the platform matures, the multiple could compress back toward a low-confidence software name, so the position needs a clear catalyst horizon and discipline around entry.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request DemoOverall Sentiment
strongly positive
Sentiment Score
0.72
Ticker Sentiment