
KeyBanc's first-quarter IT VAR survey showed 88% of partners meeting or beating plan, up from 81% last quarter, suggesting a resilient spending environment despite elevated component pricing and geopolitical uncertainty. The survey was constructive for Dell, HPE, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, and Microsoft, while cloud-spend expectations stayed strong with 87% expecting similar or faster growth in public-cloud usage. Offsetting that, the 2026 IT budget outlook softened to 2.5% from 5.3%, and 33% of partners now expect declines in U.S. federal spending.
The tape is telling us this is less a “growth is back” read-through and more a supply-led revenue pull-forward into hardware and security. That matters because the immediate winners are the names with the cleanest exposure to component scarcity and refresh cycles: Dell and HPE should see the sharpest near-term order acceleration, while Cisco gets a secondary benefit from enterprise/network refreshes even if its secular growth remains capped. The more interesting second-order effect is margin mix: higher component pricing helps top-line beats now, but it can also defer discretionary refreshes later in the year if budgets get squeezed. The biggest hidden positive is for the cybersecurity complex, where spending tends to be stickier than infrastructure when CIOs get cautious. If public-cloud growth is still holding and workloads keep shifting, then PANW and CRWD are not just benefiting from security demand—they also gain from cloud migration complexity, identity sprawl, and higher data-loss risk. That creates a multi-quarter tailwind that is less sensitive to a single budget cycle than the hardware names. The caution is that this is a timing trade, not a clean fundamental rerating. The softer 2026 budget outlook and weaker federal spending signal a likely air pocket in 1H26 ordering once pull-forward normalizes, which could pressure the hardware names hardest 2-4 quarters out. Microsoft is the most defensive beneficiary because it can monetize cloud migration and AI workloads without relying on the same hardware replacement cycle, so any market reaction that treats all six names equally is probably overstating the durability of the move. Contrarianly, the market may be underestimating how much of the current optimism is already embedded in consensus for AI and infrastructure beneficiaries. If memory and CPU inflation persists, it can become a tax on end-demand rather than a tailwind, especially for lower-ROI enterprise projects. The better expression is to own the names with recurring security/cloud spend and fade the pure hardware beta once the initial reaction fades.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
mildly positive
Sentiment Score
0.25
Ticker Sentiment