Trump claims credit for inflation coming down during Biden presidency

The key market implication is not the political scorekeeping itself, but the regime change it signals: inflation is being framed as a legacy issue rather than an active macro shock, which lowers the probability of immediate policy panic. That matters for rates because a softer narrative around inflation reduces the odds of a renewed hawkish repricing unless incoming data re-accelerate over the next 1-3 prints. In practice, this favors duration-sensitive assets if the next CPI/PCE releases stay contained, but it also makes the market more vulnerable to a sharp repricing if goods inflation or shelter re-firms.

Second-order, the bigger risk is that a political claim of victory over inflation encourages complacency just as inflation is becoming more selective. The path lower in headline CPI can mask sticky services and wage components, so the market may overestimate how quickly the Fed can ease if the disinflation story is being driven by base effects rather than broad cooling. That creates a setup where front-end yields can grind lower in the short term, but 2H rate vol rises if growth re-accelerates and tariff/policy uncertainty feeds into goods pricing.

The contrarian view is that markets may be underpricing how quickly inflation expectations can re-anchor once politics shifts from blaming to claiming credit. If consumers and firms infer that inflation is “solved,” pricing behavior can normalize, which is supportive for real wages but potentially bearish for nominal growth trades that depend on persistent pricing power. The cleanest expression is to stay tactical rather than structural: own disinflation beneficiaries only until the next data inflection, and avoid reaching for long-duration exposure without protection against a 25-50 bp upside surprise in 10-year yields.