The fund outperformed the Russell Midcap Growth Index in the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. Vertiv Holdings benefited from sharply accelerating order-book growth and share gains in cooling, while Curtiss-Wright posted a strong quarter with steady backlog growth and remains a held name as a durable compounder. Overall tone is positive, driven by solid operating momentum at both portfolio companies.
The market is likely underestimating how quickly cooling capacity becomes a bottleneck in AI infrastructure spending. If VRT is winning share in a structurally expanding market, the second-order effect is not just higher revenue visibility for one vendor, but a wider repricing of the entire electrical-thermal stack: adjacent power, switchgear, and data-center infrastructure names can benefit as customers pull forward capacity builds to secure lead times. The key issue is durability of backlog conversion versus a simple order-book headline. If the current acceleration reflects genuine design wins, the bull case extends for multiple quarters because hyperscalers rarely unwind vendor qualification quickly; if it is mostly project timing, the stock can de-rate fast once bookings normalize. The most important medium-term risk is margin dilution from mix and accelerated fulfillment costs, especially if supply chain constraints force premium component sourcing or overtime labor. Consensus still seems too focused on VRT as a pure AI beneficiary and not enough on the competitive damage to legacy thermal incumbents and slower industrial peers. That creates a potential multi-month winner/loser spread: VRT can keep taking share even without a dramatic change in end-demand, simply by being the preferred qualified partner during a capacity crunch. The contrarian risk is that expectations have moved ahead of fundamentals; once the market prices in sustained share gains, the next upside requires evidence that backlog converts into higher free cash flow, not just top-line beats. For Curtiss-Wright, the better read is that investors are paying for resilience and backlog quality in a market that still rewards duration over cyclicality. That makes it a lower-beta compounder, but also means incremental upside may be capped unless industrial capital spending broadens further. If rates stay elevated and recession fears fade, the name can continue to work quietly; if growth weakens, it should hold up better than most cyclical industrials.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request DemoOverall Sentiment
moderately positive
Sentiment Score
0.35
Ticker Sentiment