Back to News
Market Impact: 0.2

Meb Faber Says He's an Optimist—but He Thinks a Big Drop in Stocks Would Be ‘Totally Normal'

Economic DataInflationInterest Rates & YieldsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCurrency & FXEmerging MarketsCompany FundamentalsMarket Technicals & Flows
Meb Faber Says He's an Optimist—but He Thinks a Big Drop in Stocks Would Be ‘Totally Normal'

Cambria’s Meb Faber argues U.S. stocks look expensive, citing a CAPE in the low 40s (vs. a historical ~18), which he says has historically produced muted future returns. He suggests investors consider non-U.S./emerging markets where valuation is described as in the low 20s to high teens, noting foreign equity performance has lagged but valuations are more reasonable. He warns a 50% drawdown in the U.S. stock market between now and 2030 would be “totally normal,” implying near-term risk is elevated for holders concentrated in U.S. equities.

Analysis

The actionable signal here is not “buy foreign stocks” so much as “stop assuming U.S. index-level compounding is the base case.” When one market becomes the global safe default and a handful of mega-caps dominate index returns, the next regime shift usually comes from multiple compression, not an earnings collapse. That makes the best expression a relative-value one: own cheaper, less-owned, less-concentrated exposures where even modest earnings revisions can matter more than sentiment.

Near term, this is mostly a positioning and flow story, not a catalyst story. In the next 1-3 months, any pause in U.S. earnings upgrades, a stable-to-lower dollar, or softer inflation/rates data can trigger incremental reallocations into EFA/VWO and RSP as allocators look for breadth after years of index concentration. Over 6-18 months, the real risk to U.S. large-cap leadership is that rich valuation plus crowding leaves it vulnerable to a benign macro surprise that simply fails to justify the premium.

The contrarian miss is that cheap markets stay cheap without a catalyst: ex-U.S. equities still need either a weaker USD, better PMIs, or a turn in local earnings revisions. So the right stance is selective, not wholesale anti-U.S. The headline risk of a 30%-50% drawdown should be treated as a portfolio-construction warning, not a timing tool; what matters for us is whether the next leg is broadening under the surface before it shows up in index performance.

More News