Trading statement

The key read-through is not that end-markets are merely stabilizing, but that Vesuvius is showing operating discipline into a still-uneven demand tape. Positive net pricing with slightly softer steel volumes implies the company is likely defending gross margin despite only modest volume leverage, which is usually the right setup for incremental EPS resilience if energy and refractory input costs stay contained. The market should focus on mix: better pricing in a low-growth environment often signals that customers are accepting price increases because switching costs and process-critical products remain high.

Second-order, the biggest beneficiaries are probably the larger, integrated customers and disciplined peers that can preserve utilization without forced discounting. If steel outside the stated geographies is improving, that tends to support refractory replacement intensity and maintenance spending before it shows up in visible capex, which is a lagged positive for the industrial consumables chain. By contrast, weaker foundry markets outside China/India suggest uneven auto/castings demand, so suppliers with heavier foundry exposure should see less relief than steel-linked names.

The risk is that this is a pricing-led rather than volume-led recovery, which can fade quickly if steel production rolls over again in 2H or if customers push back on pricing once procurement teams reset annual contracts. Time horizon matters: the next 1-2 quarters should look better than the next 1-2 years unless underlying steel output and construction/manufacturing PMIs improve materially. A deterioration in China or a renewed Europe industrial slowdown would likely show up first in order patterns for consumables and service revenue, not headline production data.

Consensus may be underestimating how much margin protection can come from even small net price gains in a low-growth business with operating leverage. The market often prices these updates as cyclical beta, but the more durable signal is that Vesuvius is maintaining pricing power while end markets remain mixed, which can justify a higher trough multiple than a typical industrial supplier. The flip side is that if this is merely share retention via pricing discipline, volume elasticity could surface later and cap the upside.