Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: Broadcom, CrowdStrike, PVH & more

The common thread is not “mixed earnings,” but a sharper-than-usual bifurcation between firms selling scarce performance and firms selling discretionary volume. In software/security, guidance compression matters more than the current print: when a leader like CRWD misses the market’s comfort zone, it tends to reset the valuation multiple for the whole premium cybersecurity cluster, which is why PANW and FTNT can sell off even without company-specific evidence of deterioration. That kind of move usually persists for 2-6 weeks unless channel checks or large-deal commentary re-accelerate the group.

Broadcom’s miss is more important as a signal on infrastructure digestion than as a one-quarter revenue blemish. If hyperscaler and AI-linked infrastructure demand is normalizing even modestly, the second-order effect is slower order growth for adjacent networking/optical suppliers and less tolerance for rich multiple assumptions across the AI hardware basket. The key risk is that investors are extrapolating a single-quarter shortfall into a demand reset; if next-quarter bookings or backlog stay firm, the drawdown can reverse quickly over the next 1-2 earnings cycles.

Consumer winners and losers are also diverging on elasticity. FIVE’s raised outlook suggests trade-down traffic remains intact, which pressures mid-tier discretionary retailers and channels product mix toward value-oriented vendors; that is a relative positive for off-price and private-label suppliers. PVH, by contrast, looks like a classic fashion-cycle de-rating: if revenue is merely in line while guidance stalls, the market will assume promotional intensity and inventory discipline are worsening, and that can keep the stock under pressure for months unless North America wholesale and China normalize.

The contrarian setup is in AI software and cybersecurity: C3.ai’s small upside surprise is not enough to prove product-market fit, but it can force a tactical squeeze in a deeply shorted name while the market remains hypersensitive to any evidence of AI monetization. The move is likely tradable rather than structural. The bigger mistake investors may be making is treating every guide-down as demand collapse; several of these names are probably seeing budget timing and mix shifts, not outright end-demand destruction.