Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

Warren Buffett's Partner, Charlie Munger, Put Almost All His Money Into 3 Investments: Here's How They're Doing Now

BRK.ABRK.BCOSTGOOGLGOOGNFLXNVDANDAQ
Company FundamentalsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Consumer Demand & RetailManagement & GovernanceInvestor Sentiment & PositioningAnalyst Insights
Warren Buffett's Partner, Charlie Munger, Put Almost All His Money Into 3 Investments: Here's How They're Doing Now

Charlie Munger concentrated nearly all of his ~$2.6 billion net worth in three positions: Costco, Himalaya Capital (via manager Li Lu), and Berkshire Hathaway. Since his November 2023 death, Costco shares are up ~47% and paid a $15 special dividend in January 2024 and raised its regular dividend by 27%; Berkshire Hathaway Class A shares have risen ~37–38%; Himalaya’s top holding Alphabet (≈40% of AUM per its last 13F) is up ~130% over the same period. While these holdings have delivered strong absolute returns, they have modestly lagged the S&P 500’s ~52% rise, underscoring the trade-off between concentrated, quality-focused investing and broader market exposure.

Analysis

Market structure: Concentration in high-moat large caps (GOOGL +130% since Nov‑2023; COST +47%; BRK.A/B +38%) benefits dominant platforms, carded retailers and insurance-capital models while pressuring low‑margin, non-membership retailers and small-cap consumer names. Costco’s membership model and Berkshire’s float/buyback optionality amplify pricing power and liquidity advantages; Himalaya’s GOOGL concentration increases systemic exposure to ad/capex cycles. Cross‑asset: equity inflows to these names tighten IG spreads, push USD stronger on risk‑on flows, and raise implied vols in large-tech (GOOGL/NVDA) while compressing vol for defensive names (BRK/COST). Risk assessment: Tail risks include antitrust/regulatory action against Alphabet, a consumer recession hitting Costco’s discretionary basket, and a sharp equity drawdown that depletes Berkshire’s float (insurance loss shock). Immediate risks (days–weeks) are earnings/CPI prints and membership/advertising snapshots; short term (3–6 months) is ad revenue and consumer sentiment; long term (2–5 years) is moat durability vs. technological disruption. Hidden dependencies: Himalaya’s opaque concentration creates a lagged correlation spike to GOOGL; Berkshire’s performance is tied to insurance combined ratios and share‑repurchase cadence. Key catalysts: next 90 days of Costco membership metrics, Alphabet ad CPC trends, and Berkshire quarterly buyback disclosures. Trade implications: Favor concentrated exposure with risk controls — BRK.B as a core multi‑year holding (2–3% portfolio) for insurance float + buybacks; use call spreads or LEAPS to access GOOGL upside while capping premium; treat COST as tactical long with pullback entry or income via covered calls. Pair trades: long COST vs short TGT/WMT to express membership moat; deploy protective puts or defined‑risk spreads ahead of CPI/Fed windows. Entry/exit: scale in over 30 days, add on 8–12% pullbacks, trim on 20–30% outperformance or adverse catalyst realizations. Contrarian angles: Consensus praises Munger’s picks but underestimates crowding risk — GOOGL’s 130% gain implies asymmetric regulatory/valuation downside >30% in stress; BRK may be underowned by momentum managers and could rerate if buybacks accelerate (histor precedent 2008–2012 reratings). Costco’s multiple may already price peak moat expansion; a 10–20% downside on weakening comps is plausible. Unintended consequence: concentrated ownership among value managers can produce large simultaneous liquidity flows during drawdowns, amplifying moves; monitor membership renewal and ad CPC as high‑information leading indicators.