Back to News
Market Impact: 0.32

Down 45% Or More This Year, Are Any of These Once-Popular Altcoins Worth Buying?

Crypto & Digital AssetsAnalyst InsightsCompany FundamentalsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMarket Technicals & Flows
Down 45% Or More This Year, Are Any of These Once-Popular Altcoins Worth Buying?

The article argues that top Layer-1 cryptocurrencies are deeply discounted, with Ethereum and Solana both down 45% this year, while Avalanche and Cardano are down 50% and 55%, respectively. It highlights Ethereum at $1,650 versus analyst targets as high as $10,000, and Solana at $70 versus estimates near $3,200. The piece is constructive on best-in-class crypto assets but cautions against weaker competitors and more speculative names.

Analysis

The market is treating Layer-1s like a homogeneous asset class, but the dispersion underneath is widening. That matters because in crypto, capital almost always consolidates into the networks with the deepest developer liquidity, most credible security budget, and best institutional distribution; that tends to produce a winner-take-most outcome rather than a balanced rebound across the cohort. In that setup, the “cheap” names can stay cheap for years because they lack a durable catalyst to re-rate against the leaders.

The second-order effect is that downside in the laggards can actually reinforce the leaders’ moat: every week of underperformance makes it harder for smaller ecosystems to retain builders, liquidity, and treasury support. That’s especially important if risk appetite returns, because a recovery typically starts with flows into the most liquid names first, not the highest-beta survivors. If this turns into a macro-led crypto reflation trade, ETH and SOL should capture most of the marginal inflow; if it remains a stock-picker’s market, niche chains can still outperform, but only with idiosyncratic product adoption.

The contrarian point the market may be missing is timing: “undervalued” is not the same as “catalyst-rich.” The sharpest upside likely needs a combination of easing real rates, a stabilization in Bitcoin dominance, and renewed on-chain activity that proves these networks are still monetizing usage, not just narrative. Without that, these assets can grind lower or range-bound for another 1-2 quarters even if they look optically cheap versus prior cycle highs.

The real risk is that institutional allocators use any bounce to de-risk crowded crypto exposure, which would leave the weakest L1s as liquidity sources rather than beneficiaries. That creates a clean relative-value regime: own the network with institutional acceptability and short the ecosystems most likely to lose mindshare if the market gets selective again. In other words, this is less a blanket ‘buy the dip’ and more a ‘buy the monopolists, fade the pretenders’ tape.

More News