Back to News
Market Impact: 0.42

Chipmakers are overextended. Where Josh Brown is picking his spots in the sector

NVDAAVGOINTCMCHPAMATKLAC
Market Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCorporate EarningsCorporate Guidance & OutlookCompany FundamentalsArtificial IntelligenceTechnology & Innovation
Chipmakers are overextended. Where Josh Brown is picking his spots in the sector

Semiconductor stocks are in a powerful momentum surge, with SMH up almost 38% from the March 30 market bottom and nearly 50% above its 200-day moving average, though the piece repeatedly warns that the group is extremely extended. Nvidia reported $215.9B in annual revenue, Broadcom posted $19.3B quarterly revenue with AI chip revenue of $8.4B, Intel rose 24% after results and is up more than 100% YTD, and Microchip guided March-quarter revenue to about $1.26B. The article is constructive on fundamentals but explicitly risk-aware, favoring selective entries and pullbacks rather than chasing current prices.

Analysis

The common denominator here is not “AI demand” in the abstract; it is a capital-spending reflex loop where hyperscalers, networking vendors, and equipment makers are all validating the same spend cycle simultaneously. That matters because when the earnings revisions are synchronized across the stack, the market starts to price not just growth but duration of growth, which is why semis can stay extended far longer than valuation models suggest. The second-order risk is that the trade becomes self-reinforcing into the first sign of capex moderation, at which point multiple compression can be violent even if absolute demand remains healthy. The leadership mix is also telling us something about where incremental revenue is being captured. NVDA and AVGO are the cleanest expressions of the AI infrastructure buildout, but AMAT and KLAC are the more levered “tell” for whether the cycle is broadening beyond a few mega-platform names; they likely benefit if foundry and memory operators have to keep adding tools to support next-gen nodes. INTC and MCHP look more like perception-change trades than pure fundamentals, which means they can outperform sharply in a risk-on tape but also give back gains faster if the market stops rewarding turnaround narratives. From a positioning standpoint, this is late-stage momentum behavior with good fundamentals underneath it, which is usually when passive underweights get forced in and discretionary longs get squeezed. The market is likely underestimating how much of the near-term upside is already embedded in expectations, especially for the highest-RSI names, while underappreciating how quickly the group could mean-revert if broader tech leadership rolls over. The key catalyst set over the next 1-3 months is not the next good quarter, but any hint of order normalization, lead-time stabilization, or weaker guide commentary from equipment and infrastructure suppliers. Contrarian take: the easy money may be in relative value rather than outright longs. If semis remain the strongest group, the better expression is to own the structurally stronger cash generators and fade the most crowded turnaround names on strength; if the group pauses, the highest-beta names should compress first. The market is treating every good print as confirmation of a multi-year supercycle, but the more likely path is a powerful but choppy continuation where entry price matters more than narrative quality.