Back to News
Market Impact: 0.28

China property sales decline narrowed in April, Morgan Stanley stays cautious

MS
Housing & Real EstateCompany FundamentalsAnalyst InsightsCorporate Guidance & OutlookEmerging Markets
China property sales decline narrowed in April, Morgan Stanley stays cautious

Morgan Stanley said contracted sales for China’s 25 major property developers fell 9% year-over-year in April, narrowing the year-to-date decline to 31%, but it remains cautious about the durability of sales in top-tier cities. Top 50 and top 100 developers saw attributable sales decline 6% and 10% year-over-year, while several SOE developers outperformed and weaker names like CIFI, Midea RE, Longfor, Seazen, and Zhongliang fell more than 40%. The firm continues to favor CR Land, Seazen, and C&D, with COLI and Jinmao as potential outperformers if sales strengthen further.

Analysis

The key read-through is not that Chinese home sales are stabilizing, but that the market is bifurcating into a capital-access story. State-linked balance sheets with prime-city inventory are absorbing demand while private developers remain trapped in a self-reinforcing weak-sales/weak-credit loop; that means the earnings dispersion across the sector should widen before it narrows. In practice, this favors developers with land banks and project pipelines in Tier 1 cities, while forcing smaller and weaker private names to rely on discounting, asset sales, or refinancing to survive. The second-order effect is on pricing power and not just volume. If secondary-home activity keeps outpacing primary sales in top-tier cities, it can pressure new-home transaction velocity and delay any meaningful inventory clearance, which is bearish for gross margins 1-2 quarters out even if headline volumes look less bad. A sustained rebound would need to show up in listings, rent stability, and fewer concessions; absent that, today’s improvement is more likely a tactical bounce than the start of a durable cycle. The market is probably underpricing policy asymmetry: if sales weaken again, support will likely flow to SOEs and project completion rather than broad-based demand stimulus. That makes the trade skew better in relative-value than outright longs. The contrarian angle is that the strongest names may still outperform even in a flat market because investors will pay up for perceived execution and refinancing safety, while the weakest names can remain cheap for much longer than valuation models assume.