Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Trump says he still might fire Powell as Fed chair pick looms

BLK
Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsElections & Domestic PoliticsManagement & GovernanceHousing & Real EstateLegal & LitigationInvestor Sentiment & Positioning

President Trump signaled he has a preferred candidate for Fed chair but will wait to announce in January, while publicly criticizing and saying he might fire current Chair Jerome Powell. Trump indicated he wants a successor who will push for more aggressive rate cuts to lower mortgage costs, with names floated including NEC Director Kevin Hassett, former governor Kevin Warsh, governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, and BlackRock’s Rick Rieder; Powell’s chair term ends May 2026 (Board term 2028). Trump also suggested possible legal action over a Fed renovation project, adding political and legal uncertainty around the succession process.

Analysis

Market structure: A politically driven attempt to replace Powell or shift Fed leadership increases odds markets price faster easing or a credibility shock. If markets price ~50–100bp of cuts by end-2025, beneficiaries are long-duration assets, mortgage REITs, homebuilders and large ETF managers (BLK) via flows; losers are short-duration cash, money-market funds and banks with exposed NIMs. Cross-asset mechanics: a perceived easing path would likely push 2s–10s lower by 20–70bp and tighten MBS spreads by 10–40bp within 3–6 months, while a credibility hit would lift term premium and USD volatility instead. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a credible constitutional/legal showdown or an overt politicization of the Fed that raises term premium 20–80bp quickly, spiking 10y yields and MBS spreads for weeks. Immediate (days) risk = volatility around the announcement; short-term (weeks–months) = rotation into housing/long-duration; long-term (quarters–years) = regime change in central bank independence with higher structural volatility. Hidden dependencies: regional bank funding costs, broker-dealer inventory for MBS, and FX reserve managers’ reactions could amplify moves. Trade implications: Direct plays favor tactically buying duration and housing names if market-implied cuts firm; hedge with protections in case of credibility shock. Use pair trades: long PHM/DHI vs short KRE (regional bank ETF) to express margin compression vs housing demand; buy options to express asymmetric payoff (6–9 month TLT call spreads, 3-month KRE put spreads). Entry: scale in within 1–4 weeks after an official nomination or any clear White House statement; trim if 10y yield reverses >30bp against position. Contrarian angles: Consensus sees easier policy; what’s missed is the risk that a politicized Fed increases term premium and long yields — the opposite of the consensus trade — creating a crowded long-duration squeeze. Historical parallels (rare executive pressure episodes) show short-lived rallies followed by higher real yields; mispricing exists in low-implied-volatility long-duration instruments and in overly bullish mortgage-backed securities. Unintended consequence: rapid swings in MBS spreads could trigger funding stress for mortgage originators, creating opportunities to short names exposed to pipeline risk.