Back to News
Market Impact: 0.4

My Top 2 Megacap Stocks to Buy After GE Aerospace's Latest Pullback

CATHONNVDAINTCAMZNMSFTSOLSNFLXNDAQ
Artificial IntelligenceEnergy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsCorporate EarningsCorporate Guidance & OutlookCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Company Fundamentals
My Top 2 Megacap Stocks to Buy After GE Aerospace's Latest Pullback

Caterpillar reported a record backlog up 71% YoY to $51.2B and 2025 revenue of $67.6B (+4%) with EPS $18.81 (down 17.2%), citing strong power orders from hyperscalers and structural demand from electrification; management guides 2026 revenue +5–7% and raised the dividend 7% to $1.51 qtrly (yield ~0.8%, payout ratio 31.5%). Honeywell posted 2025 revenue $37.4B (+8%) with adjusted EPS from continuing ops $9.78 (+12%), set 2026 revenue guidance $38.8–$39.8B (midpoint +5%) and adjusted EPS $10.35–$10.65 (midpoint +7.4%), is completing aerospace and specialty-materials spinoffs and raised its dividend 5% to $1.19 qtrly (yield 1.9%, payout ratio 57.3%). These developments support durable demand and margin upside for both names, likely moving individual stock sentiment but not broad markets.

Analysis

Caterpillar’s most durable edge isn’t the OEM sale; it’s the multi-decade installed base and parts/service ecosystem that converts episodic capex into recurring, high-margin cashflow. That creates optionality: a sustained wave of hyperscaler and electrification-driven mining orders would primarily amplify aftermarket demand (spares, sensors, long-term service contracts) rather than single-unit margins, favoring suppliers of components, logistics/parts distributors and software integrators. For Honeywell, the spin strategy is a classic multiple-arbitrage play—separating cyclical aerospace from higher-margin software/automation should mechanically lift the parent multiple if execution avoids meaningful SG&A duplication and tax inefficiencies. The spin also creates a new floating asset (the aerospace equity) that will re-price independently, concentrating index and ownership flows in ways the market often misprices for 6–18 months post-separation. Key downside scenarios are concentrated and identifiable. A sharp pullback in hyperscaler capex (a 2–3 quarter pause) or a deflationary downturn in commodities would hit order intake and used-equipment values quickly, compressing working capital and elevating inventory risk across the supply chain. On the corporate action side, spin execution risk (cost overruns, transitional service agreements, higher interest expenses for the carved-out entity) could delay the anticipated margin expansion at Honeywell and temporarily depress free cash flow conversion. Interest-rate or funding shocks that raise borrowing costs for miners and large construction projects would be a near-term catalyst for order deferral. Practically, the market is pricing a convexity premium into these names that is uneven: Caterpillar’s AI/datacenter narrative appears embedded in sentiment more than in recurring revenue recognition, while Honeywell’s automation story looks under-owned relative to pure-play software peers. That mismatch creates structured opportunities to capture re-rating while managing event risk (capex cycles, spin timetable) with defined-loss option structures or pairs that short the cyclical counterparties who lack service aftermarket exposure.