Back to News
Market Impact: 0.85

All eyes on Powell with US Fed expected to hold rates steady

Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationEconomic DataGeopolitics & WarElections & Domestic PoliticsLegal & LitigationManagement & Governance
All eyes on Powell with US Fed expected to hold rates steady

The Fed is widely expected to hold rates steady for a third straight meeting as policymakers weigh higher energy prices, supply-chain disruptions from the US-Israel war on Iran, and still-elevated inflation alongside weak jobs growth. Jerome Powell’s likely final press conference as Fed chair will draw attention to his post-May 15 plans, while Trump’s pressure campaign and related legal disputes continue to underscore concerns about Fed independence. Markets will focus on any forward guidance for the path of rates amid the inflation-growth tradeoff.

Analysis

The market is underpricing how much a static policy rate can still be dovish if the Fed emphasizes downside growth risk and fragmentation in supply chains. A hold against a backdrop of energy shocks usually delays, rather than ends, easing pressure: higher headline inflation can coexist with weakening real activity, which is the setup that tends to steepen the curve via front-end repricing while long-end yields stay capped by growth fears. The bigger second-order issue is institutional continuity risk. If Powell stays on as a governor, the transition to a new chair is less disruptive than the headline politics suggest; if he exits entirely, the market should expect a higher probability of policy communication whiplash, with term premium widening and rate volatility rising even without an actual change in the policy rate. That matters most for assets with long-duration cash flows and for credit sectors dependent on stable financing conditions. The geopolitical angle is less about immediate macro drag than about persistence: energy-driven inflation can keep the Fed on hold for multiple meetings, which raises the bar for cyclicals and small caps already sensitive to funding costs. Meanwhile, any perceived erosion of Fed independence would likely be bullish for hard assets and inflation hedges, but bearish for nominal Treasuries and rate-sensitive equities because the market would start pricing a structurally higher inflation risk premium rather than a one-off supply shock. Consensus is likely too focused on the headline pause and not enough on the transition narrative. The key question is not whether rates move this week; it is whether the Fed’s reaction function remains credible through a leadership change under political pressure. If credibility holds, volatility should fade after the announcement; if not, the next leg is a higher term premium and a flatter risk-reward for duration longs.