Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Who Is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?

Tax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainEconomic DataInflationConsumer Demand & RetailTransportation & LogisticsEmerging Markets
Who Is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?

U.S. average statutory tariffs rose from 2.6% to 13% over 2025, but average duties collected were lower due to exemptions and importers shifting away from high‑tariff suppliers; China’s share of U.S. imports fell to below 10% while Mexico and Vietnam gained share. Regression analysis on HTS10-country monthly data through November 2025 shows roughly 86–94% pass-through of tariffs to U.S. import prices across 2025 (rising exporter incidence late in the year), implying import prices for the average‑tariffed good rose about 11% (13% × 0.86), with nearly 90% of the economic burden borne by U.S. firms and consumers.

Analysis

Market structure: The 2025 tariff surge (average statutory 13%) produced ~86% pass-through into U.S. import prices by November — implying ~11% (~13 * 0.86) higher prices on tariffed goods versus non-tariffed peers. Direct losers: import-heavy retailers and consumer discretionary (electronics, apparel) facing margin squeeze and demand elasticity; winners: Mexican and Vietnamese exporters, nearshoring logistics and domestic producers with pricing power. China’s U.S. share collapsed from ~25% (2017) to <10% (2025), reallocating ~5–9pps to Mexico/Vietnam in 2025 alone. Risk assessment: Tail risks include tariff escalation/retaliation that triggers stagflation (high-impact, <20% prob in 12 months), supply-chain shocks from abrupt re-export restrictions, or large exemption rollbacks. Near-term (days–weeks) volatility in ports, spot freight and importers’ inventory adjustments; short-term (months) margin resets and CPI blips; long-term (quarters–years) structural capex into Mexico/Vietnam and automation. Hidden dependencies: exemption policy volatility and corporate sourcing contracts (12–24 month lags) will mute immediate elasticities. Trade & cross-asset implications: Higher import-driven CPI increases odds of tighter Fed policy -> upward pressure on nominal yields and steepening; favor short duration and TIPS hedges. FX: MXN likely to strengthen on export inflows vs CNY pressure; commodities for intermediate goods (copper, steel) see localized demand uplift nearshoring; freight/spot container rates remain idiosyncratic and volatile. Contrarian angles: Consensus that U.S. consumers will permanently bear tariffs may be overdone—if foreign exporters cut margins further or firms fully offshore manufacturing capex accelerates, pass-through could fall below 50% over 12–24 months. Retail de-rating may overstate solvency risk; industrial automation and capex names could outperform as firms retool supply chains.