Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) vs. Hesai Group (NASDAQ:HSAI) Financial Comparison

Analysts and metrics in this head-to-head favor Hesai Group over Mobileye Global: Hesai carries a stronger consensus (rating score 3.13 vs 2.38), a $32.26 target implying ~109% upside versus Mobileye’s $18.94 target (~70% upside), and outperforms on 12 of 15 comparative factors. Financially Mobileye posts far higher revenue ($1.65bn) but shows a large headline loss (net -$3.09bn) and negative margins, whereas Hesai—despite much lower revenue ($284.6m)—reports positive profitability (15.7% net margin, ROE 8.04%, ROA 5.94%) and trades at a higher P/S and positive P/E (7.11 and 36.74). With materially higher institutional ownership (48.5% vs 13.3%) and stronger analyst conviction, Hesai looks more attractive on profitability and investor backing, while Mobileye offers scale and ADAS/autonomy exposure as an Intel subsidiary but currently shows weaker fundamentals.

Analysis

Analyst consensus and target-price data in the article favor Hesai Group: MarketBeat rating score 3.13 versus Mobileye Global's 2.38, with consensus targets of $32.26 (implying ~109% upside) for Hesai and $18.94 (~69.6% upside) for Mobileye. The article's rating breakdown shows Hesai with zero sell, one hold, five buy and two strong-buy ratings compared with Mobileye's two sell, nine hold and ten buy recommendations.

Fundamentals diverge materially: Mobileye reports substantially higher revenue ($1.65 billion) but a headline net loss of $3.09 billion, EPS of ($0.42), negative net margin (-17.34%), P/S 5.50 and P/E -26.60, while Hesai reports $284.57 million in revenue, reported net income of -$14.02 million alongside EPS $0.42, positive net margin 15.70%, ROE 8.04%, ROA 5.94%, P/S 7.11 and P/E 36.74 per the article's tables. Institutional ownership is 48.5% at Hesai versus 13.3% at Mobileye, and the article states Hesai outperforms Mobileye on 12 of 15 comparative factors.

Implications are directional: the article positions Hesai as the more attractive pick on profitability, analyst conviction and institutional backing, while Mobileye offers scale and ADAS/autonomy exposure as an Intel subsidiary but currently shows weaker fundamentals and a large loss. The provided sentiment signals align with this view (Hesai 0.6, Mobileye -0.4, overall moderately positive market tone), but Hesai's higher multiples and much smaller revenue base indicate execution and growth-risk dependency for the upside to materialize.

Key Decisions for Investors

• Consider overweighting Hesai relative to Mobileye given stronger analyst conviction (rating 3.13 vs 2.38), larger implied upside (109% vs 69.6%), positive margins and higher institutional ownership, Maintain a cautious position size on Hesai given its higher valuation multiples (P/S 7.11, P/E 36.74) and much smaller revenue base which imply execution risk
• Hold or underweight Mobileye until clear margin and profitability improvement is reported (current net loss $3.09bn, net margin -17.34%, EPS ($0.42)) or until demonstrable operational support from parent Intel is evidenced
• Monitor catalysts closely — quarterly margin trajectory, analyst target revisions, and institutional inflows/outflows — and reallocate if Hesai's revenue/earnings fail to validate its premium or if Mobileye shows sustainable margin recovery