Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

ビットゲット・ウォレットのユーザー数が1億人を突破、決済利用が取引利用を上回る

Crypto & Digital AssetsFintechEmerging MarketsConsumer Demand & RetailBanking & Liquidity
ビットゲット・ウォレットのユーザー数が1億人を突破、決済利用が取引利用を上回る

Bitget Wallet reported 100M+ global users and stated that for the first time daily payment users surpassed daily traders. Card issuance rose above 150k and 1H 2026 card payment volume reached $31M (about ¥5B), up 191% vs 2H 2025, with emerging markets showing a faster 416% increase. Management attributes adoption to currency weakness and high remittance fees (often 5–8% per transfer) alongside mobile-first payment rails (e.g., QR and bank transfer integrations).

Analysis

The important signal is not “crypto adoption” but the migration of stablecoins from trading inventory to working capital in FX-stressed markets. That is structurally negative for remittance franchises and cash-heavy local banks because it removes spread capture on both storage and transfer, while making dollars available 24/7 outside the domestic banking system. The first-order public-market winner is actually the card network and payment-authorization stack, since spend still has to clear through existing rails when users cash out to physical commerce.

That said, the revenue translation for MA/V is probably small near term: the spend base is tiny versus their global TPV, so this is more a volume optionality story than a near-term earnings driver. The bigger second-order effect is competitive pressure on WU/MoneyGram/PYPL cross-border checkout, plus deposit leakage risk for EM banks if dollar balances live off-balance-sheet. If this persists 6-18 months, expect higher churn in low-income consumer deposits and a lower-quality mix for local lenders exposed to payroll/merchant float.

The contrarian view is that the market may overestimate how quickly on-chain balances become mainstream payment media. Regulatory friction, KYC/AML tightening, and any stabilization in local FX can slow adoption fast; the relevant catalyst path is 1-3 months of retention and card-spend data, not the headline user count. What would falsify the thesis is a stall in card utilization or a policy move that forces wallet-to-fiat conversion back through local banks, which would restore incumbent economics.

More News