Back to News
Market Impact: 0.6

Goldman, Morgan Stanley, UBS Find Upside in Private Credit’s Downturn as War Ebbs

GSMSUBSDBBXARESGSY.TO
Private Markets & VentureCredit & Bond MarketsBanking & LiquidityGeopolitics & WarCorporate EarningsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMarket Technicals & Flows
Goldman, Morgan Stanley, UBS Find Upside in Private Credit’s Downturn as War Ebbs

Expect a record $18B stock-trading haul for banks this earnings week driven in part by volatility from the war and private credit turmoil. Asset managers are raising opportunistic credit pools: Blackstone raised $10B, Ares nearly the same, and Blue Owl $2.9B, while Morgan Stanley is launching an interval fund to buy distressed private credit. Goldman kept redemptions to 4.999% of cash in its Private Credit Fund and UBS monetized stakes by packaging them into insurance-backed debt; Deutsche Bank’s US distressed team doubled quarterly profit, underscoring sector-level opportunity amid dislocation.

Analysis

The current private-credit dislocation is creating structurally different buyers — vehicles that can (a) drip capital over quarters (interval funds), (b) securitize illiquid stakes into liability formats (insurance-wrapped debt), or (c) raise opportunistic pools of committed capital. That changes the liquidation frontier: instead of fire sales into public loan/HY markets, price discovery will be compressed into negotiated bilateral trades and structured-paper spreads, keeping public loan indices less volatile than underlying private deal marks for 3–12 months. Second-order winners are asset managers with distribution scale and balance-sheet engineering skills because they can monetize illiquids via liability transformation and captive pools; losers are mid-sized private lenders and retail wrappers that face run risk and higher funding costs. Expect a two-track market for 6–18 months — primary/private origination at wider spreads but selective deployment by price-insensitive buyers, while open-ended vehicles and smaller managers face NAV pressure that forces concessions of 15–30% vs pre-dislocation paper. Tail risks materialize if macro or geopolitical shocks re-tighten funding (short-run: days–weeks) or if a high-profile NAV shock triggers cross-asset deleveraging (medium-run: 1–6 months). Catalysts to watch that could reverse the constructive thesis: redemption wave reporting, regulatory guidance on liquidity mismatches, and a sudden tightening of bank wholesale funding that removes the arbitrage for insurer-intermediated funding conduits.