Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

Allied Critical Metals' faith in tungsten project pays off as metal price soars, governments take notice

Commodities & Raw MaterialsGeopolitics & WarTrade Policy & Supply ChainRegulation & LegislationSanctions & Export ControlsInfrastructure & DefenseCompany FundamentalsCorporate Guidance & Outlook
Allied Critical Metals' faith in tungsten project pays off as metal price soars, governments take notice

Tungsten prices have surged—APT rose from roughly US$375/MTU in 2024 to over US$1,000/MTU by end-2025—driven by defence demand and Chinese export controls, prompting Western interest in near-shoring supply. Allied Critical Metals’ brownfield Borralha project in Portugal received state recognition and a favourable Environmental Impact Declaration, reported a resource upgrade to 13.0 Mt @ 0.21% WO3 (M&I) plus 7.7 Mt @ 0.18% WO3 (inferred), and high-grade drill intercepts (12 m @ 4.27% WO3 including 6 m @ 8.39%); a 20,000 m drilling program is underway with a PEA due this quarter and funding in place through the current drilling/DFS phase. Government engagement, potential non-dilutive financing, off-take discussions and US market outreach position Borralha as a strategically important low-cost Western tungsten play.

Analysis

Market structure is shifting in favour of Western tungsten developers (direct winner: Allied Critical Metals — CSE:ACM) and European/North American smelters and defence OEMs that value secure supply (beneficiaries: RTX, GD, and aerospace/defence ETFs like ITA). Winners gain pricing power while legacy Chinese/Russian exporters risk losing margin if governments underwrite near-shore capacity. With APT pricing moving from ~US$375 (2024) to >US$1,000/MTU (end-2025), projects with all-in cash costs below ~US$600–700/MTU become investable; sustained prices >US$700 for 6+ months will trigger accelerated capex decisions across Western juniors. Key risks: low-probability high-impact scenarios include a deliberate Chinese/Russian price flood driving APT <US$400 within 12 months, Portuguese regulatory or permitting reversals, or failure to secure non-dilutive government financing (dilution >30%). Timing matters: PEA due this quarter (weeks), DFS and financing in 6–18 months, first production realistically 24–48 months. Hidden dependencies include off-take/smelter capacity, strategic stockpile timing, and export-control reciprocity that could either lock in premiums or collapse markets. Trade implications: initiate size-limited tactical longs in ACM (1–3% NAV) ahead of the PEA, add on a positive PEA and signed off-take (scale to 3–6% NAV); hedge with 9–12 month OTM put protection or use a call spread to cap premium. Parallel, rotate 1–2% into defence primes (RTX, GD or ITA) as multi-year secular demand for tungsten-backed munitions rises; consider short exposure to Asian commodity exporters only if credible ETF/stock proxies exist. Contrarian view: the market may under-price timeline and processing bottlenecks — brownfield status lowers CAPEX but does not guarantee smelter throughput or favourable metallurgical recoveries. Historical parallels (rare-earth spike 2010) show rapid price mean reversion once supply policy or substitution accelerates; set exit thresholds (APT <US$600 for 6 months or PEA IRR <15%) to avoid being caught in an overbuilt market in 3–5 years.