Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

North American manufacturing is suffering under the strain of tariffs

CGMSTLAFCAT
Trade Policy & Supply ChainTax & TariffsAutomotive & EVEconomic DataInflationRegulation & LegislationCommodities & Raw MaterialsTechnology & Innovation
North American manufacturing is suffering under the strain of tariffs

CUSMA-era rules (75% North American content for autos; 70% for steel/aluminum) have coincided with growing tariff-driven uncertainty under the Trump administration that is raising input costs and constraining North American manufacturing and autos. Key datapoints: North American trade reached $1.9tn in 2024 (a $400bn increase), U.S. manufacturing was nearly $3tn in 2024 per NAM, Canada’s exports fell just over 10% in Q2 with an 18.7% drop to the U.S., U.S. manufacturing lost 70,000–100,000 jobs last year, manufacturing prices have risen for 16 consecutive months, and the ISM index jumped from 47.9 to 52.6 in January. The policy-driven tariffs and CUSMA review risks have idled or delayed production and EV/battery investments, creating sector-specific downside for autos, suppliers, steel/aluminum producers and related capex decisions.

Analysis

Market structure: Tariffs and Section 232 uncertainty create clear winners (domestic steel/aluminum producers, remanufacturing firms, select materials ETFs) and losers (North American auto OEMs and tier-1 suppliers with cross-border footprints). Canada’s export shock (exports -10% overall, -18.7% to US) and US manufacturing job losses (70k–100k) imply near-term margin compression for OEMs and suppliers; pricing power shifts to commodity producers as input costs rise ~high-single digits-monthly. Competitive dynamics favor firms with localized supply chains (Toyota/Honda-like models) and logistics/warehousing providers that can re-shore or buffer inventory within 3–12 months. Risk assessment: Tail risks include escalation to broader auto/tariff rounds or retaliatory measures that cause >15% revenue hits for exposed OEMs, or a CUSMA review that preserves tariffs for 6–18 months. Immediate (days) risks are FX & volatility spikes; short-term (weeks–months) risks are earnings misses and capex pullbacks; long-term (quarters–years) could see capex reallocation to automation/reshoring but offset by persistent higher input inflation. Hidden dependencies: parts crossing border multiple times amplify effective tariff drag; inventory buildups can mask demand weakness until Q2–Q3. Trade implications: Tactical alpha favors short exposure to GM/STLA via limited-cost puts (3–6 month put spreads) and relative long exposure to CAT or industrials and steel miners with 6–12 month call spreads. FX trade: long USD/CAD for 1–3 months if CAD weakens >2%. Cross-asset: increase TIPS allocation to hedge tariff-driven CPI upside; reduce long-duration Treasury exposure. Contrarian angles: Markets underprice remanufacturing and circular-manufacturing winners; OEM sell-offs may be overdone for well-capitalized, localized producers (Toyota/Honda proxies). Historical parallel: 2002 steel tariffs lifted short-term protection but long-term winners were materials and automation suppliers; unintended consequence is sustained CAD weakness and sticky inflation that could force tighter Fed policy, pressuring equities.