Back to News
Market Impact: 0.68

Why the stock market has stayed resilient despite the Iran war and software stock rout

NOWCRMPLTRMSFTCRWDPANWADBETEAMSNDKWDCINTCCDNSMRVLAMDLITECOHRNVDACIENGLWGEVETNCATAMATLRCXCRWVAMZNMETAGSWFCCBACJPMJNJ
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationInterest Rates & YieldsEnergy Markets & PricesGeopolitics & WarCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsMarket Technicals & Flows
Why the stock market has stayed resilient despite the Iran war and software stock rout

The article argues that the market is being supported more by low rates than by fundamentals, with the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.32% after peaking near 4.5% on March 27 and the S&P 500 ending Friday just 2.3% below its Jan. 27 high. It highlights a sharp rotation out of software and into AI/hardware names, citing year-to-date declines of 30%-40% in many software stocks versus 50%-150% gains in hardware-related names, alongside notable moves in Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Microsoft. The piece also flags Iran-war-related oil risk, but notes U.S. natural gas futures are down more than 7% since Feb. 28 and that benign bond yields remain the key market tailwind.

Analysis

The market’s resilience is being underwritten less by fundamentals than by a rates impulse that is still too benign for bears to lean on. That creates a fragile equilibrium: equities can grind higher as long as the long end stays contained, but any re-acceleration in energy-driven inflation would matter disproportionately because positioning has become complacent around the idea that the bond market will keep “permissioning” risk assets. The key second-order effect is that rate stability is now doing more work than earnings for index level support, which means a small move in yields can have an outsized impact on crowded growth multiples. The software selloff looks like a narrative capitulation before it is a true earnings inflection. AI is being used as a blanket excuse to de-rate durable franchise software even where current bookings and cash flows remain intact; that kind of indiscriminate pressure often creates the setup for a violent mean reversion once management commentary stops confirming the bear case. The bigger issue is index construction: a few mega-cap software names with high ETF weights can drag the whole complex lower, which forces passive and systematic selling that is disconnected from company-level fundamentals. That makes the downside self-reinforcing in the near term, but also creates unusually sharp upside if one or two bellwethers print clean quarters. Hardware, by contrast, is moving from story to constraint. The trade is increasingly about who controls scarce capacity, not who has the best product narrative, and that favors memory, packaging, interconnect, and datacenter infrastructure over legacy application software. The risk is that the market is now paying for several years of AI demand in a handful of names, so any guide-down in capex cadence or a temporary digestion period can trigger 10-15% air pockets even in secular winners. Still, the underlying demand chain is broader than the current leaders, which argues for owning the suppliers with operating leverage to the buildout rather than the most obvious front-end beneficiaries. Earnings are the first real test of whether this is just a factor rotation or the start of a deeper regime shift. Banks should be read as a signal on credit quality and M&A appetite more than just EPS beats, while defensives like healthcare matter mainly as confirmation that investors are still seeking shelter. If management teams sound even slightly more cautious on pricing, capex, or hiring, the software tape could stay broken for weeks; if they remain constructive, the rally in hardware can extend quickly because shorts are under-hedged and the buyer base is thin.