
Nvidia and ASML are both benefiting from surging AI infrastructure spend: Nvidia reported fiscal 2025 sales up 114% to $130.5 billion and diluted EPS up 130% to $2.99, with fiscal-2026 Q3 revenue +62% to $57 billion and EPS +67% to $1.30, and holds an estimated ~90% share of the data-center GPU market. ASML, which supplies lithography equipment to foundries, commands an estimated 90% market share in lithography, saw service revenue rise 39% in the first nine months to €6 billion, and reported diluted EPS of $17.38 (up ~40% year-over-year for the same period). Valuation favors Nvidia in the author’s view—Nvidia trading at a P/E of ~23 versus ASML at ~34—though both are described as highly profitable and positioned to capture continued AI-driven capex.
Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates timing risk — the narrative assumes linear capex; mispricing exists where NVDA trades at ~P/E 23 vs ASML ~34 despite NVDA’s faster top‑line compounding (50–100% y/y near‑term). Historical parallel: 2017–18 fab cycles showed equipment stocks lead/lag on order execution — buying ASML pre‑delivery can be riskier than owning NVDA whose revenue books faster. Unintended consequence: excessive optimism may force customers to overbuild specialty capacity, creating a 2–3 year mid‑cycle correction of tooling orders if AI projects de‑prioritize in downturn.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
strongly positive
Sentiment Score
0.65
Ticker Sentiment