Back to News
Market Impact: 0.82

The Likelihood of a Stock Market Crash Under President Donald Trump Is Rapidly Rising -- and There's One Undeniable Catalyst to Blame

NVDAINTCGETYNFLX
Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationGeopolitics & WarElections & Domestic PoliticsTax & TariffsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Market Technicals & Flows

The article argues that a 116-basis-point two-month inflation jump, from 2.4% in February to an estimated 3.56% in April, has materially raised the odds of Fed tightening and reduced expectations for 2026 rate cuts. It links the inflation shock to Trump's decision to attack Iran, which disrupted roughly 20 million barrels per day through the Strait of Hormuz, while noting the market is already at a historically expensive valuation with the S&P 500 CAPE ratio at 40. The piece says the Fed could become more hawkish, which may trigger a broad stock market correction despite strong buybacks and prior Trump-era gains.

Analysis

The setup is a classic late-cycle “bad news is good news” regime turning into its opposite: equity multiples have been supported by the expectation of easier real rates just as the market becomes increasingly hostage to energy-driven inflation. If the Fed’s path shifts from cuts to a prolonged hold or, worse, a hike bias, the first-order hit is not just to duration-heavy growth—it is to the buyback machine that has underwritten a large share of passive demand. Higher funding costs and a lower equity risk premium tend to compress the very segment of the market that has benefited most from mechanized repurchases and AI capex enthusiasm. Second-order, the biggest vulnerability is not “the market” broadly but the crowded beneficiaries of falling rates: mega-cap software, semiconductor capex proxies, and any names trading on terminal multiple expansion. NVDA and INTC are not direct inflation winners here; they are exposed through valuation and data-center financing economics. If Treasury yields reprice higher on sticky inflation while the Fed stays on hold, the market can de-rate faster than earnings estimates fall, which is why the downside risk is concentrated in long-duration leaders rather than economically sensitive laggards. The more subtle trade is that geopolitical inflation can ironically widen dispersion: oil-linked cash generators and balance-sheet-rich companies should outperform even if the index weakens. Meanwhile, the buyback bid that has masked underlying breadth weakness can deteriorate quickly if CFOs choose liquidity preservation over repurchases. That creates a fragile market structure where a modest macro shock can trigger forced de-risking through both systematic vol targeting and discretionary factor rotation. Contrarian view: the market may be overpricing an immediate Fed reaction and underpricing the chance that energy inflation fades faster than expected once supply routes normalize. But even if the shock is temporary, the valuation base is so stretched that a short-lived inflation spike can still produce a 5-10% drawdown before earnings catch up. The key is not whether the macro thesis is permanent; it is whether the next 1-2 CPI prints keep policy tighter for long enough to break momentum.