Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Should You Forget Bitcoin and Buy MARA Holdings Instead?

MARANFLXNVDA
Crypto & Digital AssetsCompany FundamentalsArtificial IntelligenceRegulation & LegislationTechnology & InnovationEnergy Markets & PricesMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
Should You Forget Bitcoin and Buy MARA Holdings Instead?

Bitcoin peaked at $124,774 on Oct. 7, 2025 and fell about 31% to $86,413 by Dec. 16, 2025, while MARA Holdings has plunged roughly 53% since mid‑October. MARA's reported mining output declined from ~28.8 BTC/day in March 2024 to ~24.5 BTC/day 18 months later; although quarterly mining revenue rose ~37% over that period, the company's cost to produce Bitcoin jumped ~82%, pressured further by the spring 2024 halving (block rewards cut from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC) even as SEC approval of spot‑Bitcoin ETFs drove capital inflows. MARA is repositioning to sell power and data‑center/AI capacity but has no material AI contracts yet, leaving substantial execution and competition risk and making direct Bitcoin or ETF exposure comparatively more attractive in the author's view.

Analysis

Market structure: The immediate winners are spot-BTC vehicles (IBIT, BITB) and low-cost miners/hyperscalers that can monetize compute (benefits NVDA indirectly via AI demand). Losers are high-cost, vertically concentrated miners like MARA where halving + rising per-BTC all-in costs (production down ~15% while unit costs +82%) compress margins. Demand-side: ETF flows have reduced retail friction and likely sustain BTC bids, but miner sell pressure and competition for hash will keep margin volatility high. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a regulatory reversal on U.S. ETF permissiveness or aggressive miner-specific regulation (high impact, low prob), large energy-price shocks, or a sustained BTC drop below $60k triggering forced asset sales. Time windows: days–weeks = volatility spikes and funding squeezes; 3–12 months = operational/contract milestones (AI hosting deals); multi-year = structural shift if MARA signs recurring AI revenue. Hidden dependency: MARA’s valuation depends on securing long-term power/AI contracts; failure to convert capex into contracted revenue forces equity dilution. Trade implications: Favor direct BTC exposure via ETFs or spot vs equity miners—construct long IBIT/BITB tranches while keeping miner exposure small and tactical. Pair trade: long IBIT, short MARA to isolate Bitcoin beta from operational/mining risk. Use options to size asymmetric bets: long-dated call exposure to MARA’s AI optionality funded by put spreads to cap downside. Contrarian angles: The market may be underpricing MARA’s optionality to sell power/space to AI customers — a single ~ $50–100m annual contract would materially re-rate shares; conversely the market could be right given 82% cost inflation. Historical parallel: hardware miners that repurposed facilities into colocation/edge data centers re-rated only after multi-quarter contract evidence. Key unintended consequence: miner-to-AI pivots can tighten GPU supply, amplifying NVDA earnings upside.