Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

Apple Set to Top Samsung in Global Smartphone Shipments, Analyst Says

AAPL
Technology & InnovationConsumer Demand & RetailProduct LaunchesAnalyst InsightsAntitrust & CompetitionCompany Fundamentals
Apple Set to Top Samsung in Global Smartphone Shipments, Analyst Says

Counterpoint Research forecasts Apple will overtake Samsung as the world’s largest smartphone vendor in 2025 and maintain the lead through at least 2029, projecting Apple global market share at 19.4% versus Samsung’s 18.7%. The firm expects Apple shipments to rise 9% year-over-year in Q3 2025—driven by stronger-than-expected demand for the iPhone 17 lineup and replacement cycles (including 358 million second-hand iPhones sold 2023–Q2 2025)—while Samsung shipments grew 4.6% YoY. Counterpoint also cites planned product breadth (foldable and budget models) and resilient demand despite delayed AI features as factors supporting Apple’s multiyear advantage.

Analysis

Market structure: Apple (AAPL) gaining to ~19.4% vs Samsung ~18.7% shifts pricing power toward Apple—ASP resilience and services mix should protect gross margins and push supplier revenue to TSMC (TSM) and select component vendors. Winners: AAPL, TSM, high-margin accessory and services names; losers: Samsung (SSNLF OTC), lower-tier Android OEMs and mid-cycle refurbishers. Demand signal: a broad upgrade wave (COVID-era buyers) implies a multi-year replacement tailwind rather than a one-off spike, supporting 5–9% annual iPhone shipment growth in 2025–2027 under base case. Risk assessment: Tail risks include regulatory antitrust actions (US/EU/China) and geopolitically driven TSMC/Taiwan supply disruption—both can compress multiples by 10–30% in stressed scenarios. Short-term (days–weeks) equity reactions to upgrade-cycle data and earnings will dominate; medium-term (3–12 months) depends on foldable/budget rollout execution; long-term (1–5 years) depends on sustaining services monetization and pricing. Hidden dependency: heavy reliance on used-iPhone upgrade funnel and TSMC capacity; if second-hand market slows, replacement cadence and gross margins could fall. Trade implications: Tactical: establish a 2–4% long AAPL equity position and a 1–2% long TSM to capture supplier upside; pair trade long AAPL / short SSNLF (equal-dollar) to express relative share shift. Options: buy 12–18 month AAPL LEAP 15–25% OTM call spreads to cap premium (sell nearer strikes to fund). Rotate overweight to semiconductors and services exposure, underweight low-margin smartphone OEMs and discretionary retail; enter within next 2–6 weeks and scale out after +10–20% realized gains. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates concentrated supply risk (TSMC) and regulatory pushback on ecosystem practices; the market may be underpricing a 10–20% downside if Beijing/US tensions disrupt fabs or antitrust fines escalate. Reaction could be partially overdone in equities but underdone in options—IV likely too low on AAPL LEAPs given execution risk on foldable/budget launches. Historical parallel: hardware share leadership swaps (Nokia era) show platform + services moat matters; if Apple stalls on AI/Siri rollouts, upgrades could decelerate despite share gains.