Back to News
Market Impact: 0.4

Better Mining Stock: The Metals Company (TMC) vs. SSR Mining (SSRM)

SSRMBACNFLXNVDAINTC
Commodities & Raw MaterialsCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsRegulation & LegislationTrade Policy & Supply ChainAutomotive & EVLegal & Litigation

SSR Mining reported $1.63B in revenue (up ~64% YoY) and net income of $395.8M versus a $261.3M loss the prior year, and sold its 80% Çöpler stake for $1.5B in cash. The Metals Company (TMC) obtained a NOAA finding of "substantial compliance" on March 9 for a consolidated U.S. deep-seabed application but still faces ISA delays, permitting and legal risks with production not expected until ~late 2027; its target polymetallic nodules supply nickel, copper, cobalt and manganese to reduce reliance on foreign (notably Chinese) sources. Investment implication: SSRM is the nearer-term, lower-risk way to play rising gold/silver prices, while TMC is a high-risk, speculative play on domestic critical-mineral supply.

Analysis

Winners will be firms that control downstream processing and refining capacity in the U.S. — not just the miners themselves — because any domestic source of nickel/copper/cobalt shifts value capture downstream into cathode, precursor, and specialty chemical margins. Second-order beneficiaries include project lenders and insurers that write long-dated, non-recourse financing for unconventional supply projects; a re-pricing of that risk would widen credit spreads to smaller juniors and compress their ability to raise capital. Conversely, established land-based junior nickel and copper developers that rely on Chinese offtake agreements are most exposed if capital reallocates toward domestically oriented projects. Key risks are regulatory and macro, and they operate on different clocks. Regulatory/legal tail risk can add multiple years to any timetable — model 12–36 months to reach substantive approvals and treat >36 months as a realistic downside case if litigation or international moratoria resurface. Macro risks are faster: a 100bp uptick in real yields historically compresses gold prices by ~10–15% within 3–6 months, which would mechanically amplify earnings and equity downside for highly levered precious-metals producers in the short term. Practical trade structures should separate regulatory binary risk from commodity risk. For precious-metals exposure, use a directional but hedged structure (buy SSRM equity or 9–12 month call spread, hedge with a 25–35% OTM covered call/put to finance cost) to capture upside if real yields stabilize. For the deep-sea miner, favor asymmetry: buy 12–24 month puts or establish a short-equity position sized to a regulatory-event stop; if seeking limited loss, construct a long-dated put spread to cap financing risk. Contrarian read: the market understates the political path to acceleration — strategic imperative for battery supply could force regulatory concessions, making the deep-sea story binary rather than purely speculative. If that happens, the rerating is rapid and large, but the probability remains low; tradeable edge is therefore timing and convexity, not binary outright longs without option protection.