Back to News
Market Impact: 0.72

2 Wall Street brokers say the bottom is in for the S&P 500

SMCIAPP
Geopolitics & WarMarket Technicals & FlowsAnalyst InsightsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCorporate EarningsCorporate Guidance & OutlookTechnology & Innovation
2 Wall Street brokers say the bottom is in for the S&P 500

RBC's Lori Calvasina reiterated a 12-month S&P 500 target of 7,750, implying about 13.6% upside from the April 9 close, and said the index may have formed a "fragile, foggy bottom." Wolfe Research's Chris Senyek said the S&P 500 low of 6,343 is in, but warned that upcoming first-quarter earnings from technology and semiconductors are a key near-term test. The article also cites a potential U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a geopolitical shock that could reverse recent equity gains.

Analysis

The market is treating this as a positioning event, not yet a macro regime change, which is why the first-order reaction can still look complacent. The bigger second-order risk is that a geopolitical shock lands on top of already concentrated index leadership: if earnings momentum from large-cap software/semis wobbles, passive flows can flip from stabilizer to amplifier very quickly. That makes the S&P less about the headline event and more about whether breadth can absorb any disappointment in the highest-multiple cash-flow streams. The most vulnerable setup is not “stocks versus bonds” but “duration within equities” — long-trajectory growth names, semiconductor supply chains, and AI infrastructure beneficiaries are trading as if earnings resilience is enough to offset any risk premium expansion. If energy-driven inflation ticks up, rates can back up even without a growth scare, compressing multiples exactly where market leadership is most crowded. In that scenario, the apparent support in the index can mask a large rotation beneath the surface rather than a clean trend reversal. The contrarian take is that a limited strike/blockade headline is not automatically bullish for defensive sectors if it shortens the window for uncertainty and keeps the macro damage contained. The market may be underpricing the speed with which any de-escalation would trigger a fast unwind in volatility and a sharp rebound in cyclicals and small caps. The right way to think about this is that the near-term payoff is asymmetrical only if the shock persists into earnings season; otherwise the trade is likely to be a brief factor rotation, not a durable equity bear market.