Back to News
Market Impact: 0.85

Stock Market Crash Under President Trump? History Says Investors Have Reason to Worry.

Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationCredit & Bond MarketsTax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainGeopolitics & WarMarket Technicals & Flows

The article warns that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite could face a correction as inflation remains elevated, with CPI at 4.2% in May, PPI at 6.5%, and the 30-year Treasury yield at 5.18%, its highest since July 2007. It argues that a potential Fed rate-increase cycle, combined with newly proposed 10% to 12.5% tariffs on 60 countries, could pressure equities and even push markets toward bear territory. The backdrop is further complicated by geopolitical disruption tied to Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, which has helped keep oil prices and inflation elevated.

Analysis

The market is pricing a soft landing while the macro tape is shifting toward a classic multiple-compression setup: higher real yields, stickier inflation expectations, and a policy regime that can tighten even if growth is already decelerating. That combination is especially toxic for duration-heavy equities, because the equity risk premium has to widen from both ends simultaneously: discount rates rise while earnings estimates get pressured by tariff pass-through and weaker consumption. The first-order selloff risk is not just “higher rates,” but a reflexive drawdown if systematic flows de-risk when volatility rises and bond-equity correlations stay positive.

The more interesting second-order effect is that tariffs are a tax on operating leverage, not just on consumers. Import-dependent sectors face margin compression before headline inflation fully rolls through, which means earnings revisions can turn negative faster than the market expects even if CPI remains elevated only for a few prints. That would likely hurt cyclicals and small caps disproportionately versus large-cap quality, but it also raises the probability of factor crowding into defensives and cash-rich megacap balance sheets, creating a narrow-market regime rather than a broad collapse.

For NVDA and INTC, the direct tariff exposure is modest in the data, but the implied hit comes via capex cycle and supply-chain friction rather than product demand alone. If rates and tariffs bite together, enterprise hardware orders can delay by a quarter or two, while AI spend may remain more resilient than the rest of IT because it is still strategic capex; that makes NVDA relatively better than INTC on earnings durability, though both can trade down with the index. NFLX is the cleanest beneficiary on the list from a recessionary lens: low-ticket subscription spending holds up better than discretionary physical goods, and lower growth usually helps net retention via trading down from more expensive entertainment, but it is not immune if the market de-rates high-multiple growth overall.