Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Homes are selling below asking in 38 of the 50 biggest U.S. cities—if you can afford one

Housing & Real EstateConsumer Demand & RetailInterest Rates & YieldsEconomic Data
Homes are selling below asking in 38 of the 50 biggest U.S. cities—if you can afford one

In Redfin’s June data, homes sold below their asking price in 38 of the 50 largest U.S. housing markets, with the biggest average discounts in Miami (-4.66%) and West Palm Beach, FL (-4.59%), followed by Houston (-3.53%) and Austin, TX (-3.17%). Nationally, only ~25% of homes sold above asking price, down from ~55% at the 2022 pandemic peak, as higher mortgage rates reduce buyer affordability and sellers adjust more slowly. While negotiation room is expanding—especially in parts of Florida and Texas—fast-moving, well-priced homes in high-demand areas still attract multiple offers.

Analysis

The signal is less about home prices and more about the velocity of transactions normalizing from a frenzy to a negotiation market. That is structurally negative for transaction toll-booths like brokers, title insurers, and lead-gen platforms because the margin pool shifts away from urgency premiums and toward price shopping; the first-order effect is fewer bidding wars, the second-order effect is longer days on market and more fall-through risk. In the Sun Belt, where inventory is heavier, the pressure is worse because sellers are competing not just against each other but against new-build supply, so local pricing power can reset faster than national averages imply.

For builders, this is a mixed setup: it improves affordability and can keep entry-level demand alive, but it also caps resale comps and forces more incentives, so gross margin expansion is limited unless rates fall. The biggest beneficiary on a 1-3 month horizon may be the best-capitalized national builders with flexible land positions, while smaller regionals in FL/TX face the most earnings revision risk. Over 6-18 months, the real winner could be multifamily if ownership remains expensive enough that households keep renting; the loser would be anyone assuming a quick re-acceleration in resale turnover.

The consensus may be underestimating how sticky seller psychology is: if homeowners wait to cut, liquidity stays thin even if headline prices look stable, which is bearish for volume-sensitive financials more than for housing itself. The flip side is that this is not yet a broad distress signal; in supply-constrained metros, pricing is still functioning normally, so a housing crash trade looks premature. What would falsify the bearish transaction thesis is a clear 1-2 month rebound in mortgage applications and pending home sales, or a meaningful drop in rates that re-ignites multiple-offer behavior.

More News