Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

3 Oil & Gas Drilling Stocks Bucking a Bearish Industry Trend

+3
Energy Markets & PricesAnalyst EstimatesInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCredit & Bond MarketsCompany FundamentalsMarket Technicals & Flows
3 Oil & Gas Drilling Stocks Bucking a Bearish Industry Trend

Zacks’ Oil & Gas - Drilling industry shows a bearish setup with a Zacks Industry Rank of #185 (bottom 25%) and aggregate 2026 earnings estimate revisions down 56% over the past year. Despite this, the group has still outperformed, rising 68.9% over the past year versus 33.6% for the broader energy sector and 22% for the S&P 500, trading at 23.47x trailing EV/EBITDA vs 18.03x for the S&P 500. The article frames the near-term margin outlook as dependent on rig utilization/day rates supported by limited advanced rig supply, but vulnerable to crude-price volatility and geopolitical policy risks.

Analysis

The tradeable issue is not "drilling is improving"; it is that the market is already paying for a fairly optimistic utilization/day-rate path while forward estimates are still being cut. In capital-intensive rig names, that combination usually means multiple compression can offset otherwise decent operating leverage if customer capex pauses even modestly. The cleanest beneficiaries are the contractors with contracted backlog, better asset quality, and lower refinancing pressure; the most fragile are levered names where a small slowdown in reactivation leaves fixed costs and interest expense exposed.

Second-order, the tight supply of high-spec rigs is a tax on smaller private E&Ps first: they are the least disciplined but also the most price-sensitive, so they will defer work faster than the majors when crude softens. That creates a near-term split between "available-at-any-price" premium rigs and the rest of the fleet, but it also raises the odds that industry pricing power peaks before volumes do. If oil chops lower over the next 1-3 months, utilization can roll over quickly because spot demand in land drilling is thin and re-contracting windows are short.

Contrarian view: the consensus is likely underestimating how much of the good news is already in PTEN/HP/NBR after outsized share-price gains, while overestimating the durability of international expansion as a clean offset. NBR is the most vulnerable to regional/logistics friction and balance-sheet sensitivity; HP has the best franchise quality but least valuation margin for error; PTEN sits in the middle with better diversification, but even there the bar is now high. Over 6-18 months, the key falsifier is not rig count alone but whether 2026 EPS revisions stabilize—if they keep falling, the group’s premium EV/EBITDA can de-rate fast even with stable activity.

More News