Jerry Jones would rather take other teams’ trade calls than make calls himself

This is less about “team needs” and more about auction structure: the side that initiates often reveals the most urgency, which creates a temporary information edge for the counterpart. In draft markets, that usually translates into a small but real expected-value advantage for the team sitting on the premium picks, because impatient buyers overpay in perceived scarcity windows. The Cowboys’ position makes them a natural liquidity provider if the board breaks in a way that compresses the value gap between late first and early third-round talent.

The second-order effect is on teams hunting a quarterback or the last tier of impact defenders: if they think the top of the board is thinning, they may pay up before the first domino falls. That dynamic tends to steepen the trade curve around pick clusters, with the first mover extracting more than fair value from the next mover. The likely outcome is not a dramatic full-scale move-down, but a selective monetization of one premium slot into multiple shots at a lower-cost part of the draft.

The risk is execution timing. If the Cowboys wait too long, the market can gap against them once one or two trades set a new comp, and the expected premium from being the “called” side disappears. The catalyst window is hours, not weeks: this is a draft-night microstructure event, and the advantage exists only while multiple clubs still believe they can win the same player at a discount.

Contrarian take: the consensus may overstate the willingness to trade simply because the team has talked about it. Public signaling can be a bluff to test demand without committing to action, and that often results in no trade if the offers do not include a future first or equivalent surplus value. The more interesting read is that the team is optimizing for optionality, not necessarily volume; that favors patience and hard price discipline over headline-grabbing activity.