Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

US economy expected to grow faster in 2026 despite stagnant job market: Goldman Sachs

GS
Tax & TariffsInflationMonetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsEconomic DataFiscal Policy & BudgetArtificial IntelligenceRegulation & Legislation

Goldman Sachs projects U.S. real GDP will accelerate to 2.6% in 2026 (vs. Bloomberg consensus 2%), driven by fading tariff drag, roughly $100 billion in consumer tax refunds (≈0.4% of annual disposable income) from the OBBBA, full expensing boosting capex signals, and more favorable financial conditions from prospective Fed rate cuts and deregulation. Headwinds remain: the average effective tariff rate jumped ~11 percentage points and trimmed ~0.6 percentage point from GDP in H2 2025, core PCE inflation ran at ~2.8% in 2025 (tariff pass-through currently ~0.5pp, may rise to ~0.8pp by mid-2026) but is expected to fall to just above 2% by end-2026, while the unemployment rate is expected to stabilize around 4.5% with limited near-term improvement.

Analysis

Market structure: Reduced tariff drag and $100B of consumer refunds (≈0.4% of annual disposable income) materially reallocate near-term demand from importers to domestic capital goods and AI/cloud suppliers. Winners: capital-equipment OEMs (CAT, DE), semiconductor-equipment and AI infra (SOXX/NVDA), domestic-focused staples; Losers: import-heavy retailers and apparel (AMZN, TGT) and low-margin importers that lose pricing power. Supply/demand: fading tariff pass-through (from ~0.5pp now to ~0.8pp mid-2026 then fading) should relieve input-cost inflation H2 2026, tightening real demand for capex while loosening consumer discretionary real purchasing power in H1 2026. Risk assessment: Key tail risks are tariff re‑escalation (policy shock), faster-than-expected AI-driven productivity forcing layoffs (unemployment >5.0%), and sticky core PCE (>3.0%) that delays Fed cuts. Time horizons: watch immediate (next 30–90 days) for IRS refund flows and tariff announcements, short-term (Q1–Q2 2026) for capex orders and ISM new‑orders lift, long-term (2026–27) for durable productivity effects from AI. Hidden dependencies include concentration of refunds in higher‑save cohorts and front‑loaded capex that could reverse in 2027. Trade implications: Tactical long industrials/capex and semiconductor-equipment exposure for H1–H2 2026, paired with disciplined shorts of import-exposed retail names. Rate-sensitive assets should reposition for Fed cuts: overweight 7–10y duration on signals of a cut cycle (expect 40–70bp downward pressure on 10y into late‑2026). Use call spreads on OEMs and put spreads on large retailers; size trades to 1–3% of portfolio each with explicit stop-loss triggers. Contrarian angles: Consensus underweights the risk that AI accelerates job cuts—if productivity surprises, consumer demand may fall even as capex booms, compressing margins in consumer-facing sectors. Full expensing can produce a one‑time capex spike then normalization (mean reversion in orders by 2027), so avoid buy-and-hold concentration; mispricing likely in domestically oriented industrials (underowned) and in cyclical retailers (over-owned). Historical parallel: post‑tax‑cut capex bursts that faded after 12–18 months (early 2000s); position for a front-loaded 2026 rally, hedge for a 2027 rollback.