Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

How will politics shape markets in 2026?

CMEUBSSMCIAPP
Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationTrade Policy & Supply ChainTax & TariffsElections & Domestic PoliticsGeopolitics & WarArtificial Intelligence
How will politics shape markets in 2026?

UBS expects political headlines to dominate 2026 but argues their market impact tends to be short-lived as investors refocus on solid fundamentals, falling interest rates and structural growth drivers like AI. Key risks include a pending U.S. Supreme Court decision on the administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act — which could affect roughly 70% of tariff revenue and lead to new targeted tariffs — alongside global political instability (France, U.K.), conflicts (Ukraine, Middle East) and a busy Latin American electoral calendar. The bank also flags a leadership transition at the Fed in 2026 but anticipates monetary policy will remain broadly supportive for markets, and calls attention to Japan’s fiscal stance and China’s new Five-Year Plan emphasizing growth, security and technology.

Analysis

Market structure: CME is a direct beneficiary of the EBS FX platform reopening — restores fee capture and market-making flow that should lift daily ADV-related revenue by a material but temporary amount; expect a 3–6 month revenue re-acceleration as liquidity normalizes. AI hardware winners (SMCI) and ad/AI-platform beneficiaries (APP) keep secular tailwinds as rates ease; exporters and tariff-sensitive industrials are the primary losers if trade-policy oscillation resumes. Risk assessment: Key tail risks include a SCOTUS decision on tariffs (likely within 90–180 days) that could re-shape tariff incidence and provoke retaliatory measures, and operational failure at CME that would re-route FX flow to rivals — both could move intraday IVs 20–50%. Near-term (days–weeks) effects will be FX and intraday volatility; medium-term (months) will be earnings and capex for AI names; long-term (quarters–years) centers on Fed leadership in 2026 and structural AI adoption. Trade implications: Tactical: favor CME (CME) and AI hardware (SMCI) exposure while buying downside protection; overweight long-duration bonds (TLT or 7–10y futures) on UBS’s view that policy remains supportive if inflation continues to fall by 25–75bp over 6–12 months. Use relative-value: long SMCI vs short INTC to express AI compute share shift, and buy FX/commodity volatility plays ahead of tariff/SCOTUS windows. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates policy risk clustering — a divided U.S. Congress may cap sweeping trade fixes, making tariff shocks more episodic than structural, which argues against over-hedging global cyclicals. Historical parallels (tariff scares 2018–19) show sharp but short-lived price dislocations; therefore size positions conservatively and favor option-defined risk (premium paid) over naked directional exposure.