Global IPO markets raised $158.4 billion across 1,227 deals in 2025, an 18% increase year-on-year, with the Hong Kong Exchange leading at HKD272.1 billion ($34.3 billion), a 210% jump from 2024. Hong Kong's surge was driven by a record wave of A+H dual listings and a pipeline of over 300 active IPO applications (including 92 A+H applicants), concentrated in TMT (39%), healthcare/life sciences (21%) and industrials (18%); notable Hong Kong listings included CATL ($4.6bn), Pony AI ($860m) and Mixue ($444m). KPMG expects the IPO momentum and AI-related listings in Hong Kong to continue into 2026, while other exchanges—NYSE ($20.3bn), NASDAQ ($19.2bn), India ($18.5bn) and Shanghai ($13.2bn)—show mixed results.
Market structure: Hong Kong/HKEX (0388.HK) is the primary winner as IPO fee income and market-making flow shift—HKEX raised HKD272.1bn vs ~US$20bn on major U.S. exchanges—giving it short-to-medium term pricing power and higher trading volumes. Direct beneficiaries include A+H listing candidates (tech, healthcare), global bookrunners, and custody/prime brokers; losers are marginal U.S. IPO venues and smaller domestic exchanges losing deal flow. Cross-asset effects include incremental CNH/HKD inflows (supporting onshore yield compression), elevated equity market liquidity, and higher implied vols in single-stock options around large IPOs. Risk assessment: Key tail risks are a regulatory reversal on A+H approvals or tightened capital controls in China, U.S. geopolitical sanctions on dual-listing structures, or a tech-sector drawdown that re-prices newly listed names; probability materializes within 3–12 months. Immediate: higher headline volatility around blockbuster listings (days–weeks). Short (1–6 months): lock-up expiries and secondary supply could depress prices; long (6–24 months): sustained policy support could entrench HK as the dominant Asian IPO hub. Hidden dependency: continuation depends on mainland liquidity policy and Guangdong/HK capital flows—watch PBOC and CSRC communications closely. Trade implications: Favor exchange and Hong Kong market infrastructure exposure, thematic long positions in AI/tech/healthcare Chinese equities, and hedges on U.S. exchange share loss. Use size discipline (1–3% per idea) with volatility-aware option overlays; expect 20–40% asymmetry if policy stays favorable but cut losses quickly on negative regulatory signals. Catalysts to monitor: top-5 A+H approvals, large listings (>$3bn) cadence, and monthly active IPO application counts crossing upward of 350. Contrarian/risks: Consensus may underprice regulatory fragility—if >20% of the 300 active IPO apps withdraw in 60–90 days, expect a market re-rating in HK equities and sharp repricing of related brokerages. Historical parallel: 2018–2019 saw capital flow reversals after policy shocks; current optimism could be overdone if China re-prioritizes domestic market funding instead of international exits. Hedge with asymmetric option structures and size positions assuming a 12-month policy drift scenario.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
moderately positive
Sentiment Score
0.60
Ticker Sentiment