
A new study by Joseph Henry and Terry O’Brien challenges the long-held belief of significant US IPO underpricing, asserting that day-one surges are primarily driven by a small cohort of 'superfan' investors rather than broad market inefficiency. Analyzing over 30 years of data, the research suggests IPOs are potentially up to 40% less underpriced than commonly perceived, implying a more efficient initial valuation process than previously understood.
A new academic study by researchers Joseph Henry and Terry O’Brien challenges the conventional wisdom regarding the underpricing of US initial public offerings. Analyzing over 30 years of market data, the research contends that the day-one price surge, or 'pop', is primarily driven by a small segment of highly enthusiastic 'superfan' investors rather than a systemic market inefficiency. This finding suggests that IPOs are significantly less underpriced than commonly believed, potentially by as much as 40%. The implication for institutional investors is that the initial IPO valuation may be more efficient and closer to fair value than the volatile early trading suggests, and that the pop itself is an artifact of concentrated demand, not a market-wide mispricing signal.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request a DemoOverall Sentiment
mildly positive
Sentiment Score
0.35