First Western (MYFW) Q1 2026 Earnings Transcript

MYFW is inflecting from a balance-sheet story into a earnings-translation story: the key is that deposit growth is now outrunning loan growth, which gives management more room to reprice liabilities down without paying up for marginal assets. That matters because the company’s margin expansion is not just cyclical beta to rates; it is increasingly a mix shift toward relationship deposits, lower wholesale dependence, and better loan pricing discipline. The second-order effect is that every incremental DDA dollar should have an outsized impact on 2026 EPS, since the bank is already operating with a relatively fixed expense base.

The bigger competitive signal is geographic: local disruption is functioning like a labor-arbitrage trade for MYFW. Larger-bank retrenchment in Colorado and adjacent markets can allow a subscale player with a relationship model to hire producers and capture share without a matching increase in overhead; that is a durable advantage as long as the bank avoids paying peak comp for teams. The risk is that this is still a thin-footprint growth model — one or two mis-hired teams, or a pause in migration from nationals, could slow the operating leverage story faster than credit would, because the market is now underwriting continued multiple-quarter momentum.

The main contrarian point is that consensus will likely focus on NIM, but the more important upside driver is fee normalization from mortgage and wealth, both of which are still early in their recovery. If those businesses keep contributing while loan growth stays around 10% and expenses remain anchored near the current run-rate, MYFW can plausibly close the gap to a sub-70% efficiency ratio over the next few quarters, which would re-rate the stock before ROA fully gets back to 1%. The valuation setup looks attractive if the market is still pricing this as a low-growth community bank rather than a self-help compounder.

The risk skew is asymmetric over the next 1-2 quarters: Q2 may look softer on deposits due to tax seasonality, which could create a tradable dip if investors extrapolate too aggressively. Asset quality looks contained, but the real tail risk is not credit—it is execution drift on new hires and a reversal in the migration/recruitment tailwind that has been masking scale constraints. A slower NIM path would matter less if fee and operating leverage stay intact; if both stall, the stock likely de-rates quickly because the current thesis is momentum-heavy rather than purely balance-sheet defensive.