Peace Deal Uncertain as Iran Says Strait of Hormuz is Shut

The market is likely underpricing the asymmetry of a chokepoint shock because the first-order move is not just crude prices but the re-pricing of freight optionality. If routing confidence deteriorates, the winners are shipowners and insurers with the ability to pass through war-risk premiums, while the losers are refiners, chemical producers, and any importer reliant on just-in-time inventory. The second-order effect is that even a brief disruption can tighten prompt physical differentials faster than front-month futures, so equities tied to spot margin exposure may react before headline energy benchmarks fully reflect the risk.

The bigger issue is duration. A days-long restriction mainly hits sentiment and freight, but a weeks-long disruption forces refiners and traders to rebuild inventories, which can widen crack spreads in some regions while compressing them in others depending on crude source mix. Over months, the real macro loser is global growth: higher delivered energy costs feed into freight, airlines, trucking, and emerging-market FX, creating a broader risk-off impulse even if the initial catalyst is regional and reversible.

The contrarian view is that the market may already be conditioned to discount Middle East brinkmanship unless physical flows are visibly impaired. That argues for a tactical, not structural, response: if tankers continue moving with only modest premiums, the risk premium can fade quickly. But if any insured hull rates or Suez/Hormuz voyage cancellations start to compound, the move becomes self-reinforcing because every additional carrier exit tightens effective capacity more than the headline volume loss suggests.