Back to News
Market Impact: 0.15

How To YieldBoost Scorpio Tankers From 3.3% To 13.6% Using Options

STNGNDAQ
Capital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)Derivatives & VolatilityFutures & OptionsMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCompany Fundamentals
How To YieldBoost Scorpio Tankers From 3.3% To 13.6% Using Options

Scorpio Tankers (STNG) is trading around $50.62 with an annualized dividend yield of roughly 3.3% and a trailing-12-month volatility of about 42% (based on the last 250 trading days). The note evaluates selling a July 2026 covered call at a $57.50 strike as a way to generate income while capping upside beyond that level. Broader options flow mid-afternoon showed S&P 500 put volume of 556,468 versus call volume of 1.01M (put:call 0.55 vs long-term median 0.65), signaling relatively higher call buying interest today.

Analysis

Market structure: Direct winners are equity holders and short-term option sellers—STNG equity at $50.62 with a 3.3% dividend is attractive if freight profits persist; exchange NDAQ also wins from above-average options flow (put:call 0.55 vs median 0.65). Losers would be unhedged long-call buyers if volatility collapses or owners of newer, high-cost tonnage if charter rates fall. The $57.50 July 2026 covered-call trade caps ~13.6% upside from spot while collecting premium; implied/realized vol ~42% drives option pricing and trade economics. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a >30% hit to spot rates from a demand shock (China slowdown or global recession), regulatory/insurance shocks to sanctioned routes, or a surge in newbuild deliveries increasing capacity by ~10–20% over 12–24 months. Immediate (days) risk is option gamma exposure and skew moves around macro prints; short-term (weeks–months) risk is seasonal charter volatility tied to refinery turnarounds; long-term (quarters–years) risk is structural fleet growth and scrappage. Hidden dependencies: STNG dividend hinges on volatile charter cashflows and counterparty credit; key catalysts are weekly EIA/IAEA crude flows, OPEC+ decisions, and Chinese import data. Trade implications: Core constructive trade is a modest 2–3% long position in STNG scaled at incremental buys under $50 and $48, funded by selling July 2026 $57.50 covered calls if implied vol ≥40% to generate >=5% annualized income while capping upside to ~14%. Protect downside with cheap 6–9 month $45 puts sized to limit drawdown to ~8–10% of position cost (target cost <3% of notional). Take a separate 1–2% long in NDAQ to capture structurally higher fee income from elevated options volumes; trim if daily put:call reverts above 0.7 or realized vol collapses below 25%. Contrarian angles: Consensus bullish options flow may understate downside from sudden freight rate slippage—implied vol at 42% could be overstating event risk if global oil demand stabilizes, creating an opportunity to sell calendar/vertical spreads into volatility that exceeds realized moves. Mispricing threshold: if STNG closes >$60, unwind covered-call/hedge combos and rotate gains to cyclicals with lower operational leverage; if STNG breaks < $40 on volume, aggressively add given historical tanker-cycle rebounds (2016–18) where sub-$40 entries yielded >2x over 12–24 months.