Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

1 Stock I'd Buy Before ChargePoint in 2026

CHPTCIFRWAMZNNFLXNVDANDAQ
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCrypto & Digital AssetsCompany FundamentalsCorporate EarningsAutomotive & EVEnergy Markets & Prices
1 Stock I'd Buy Before ChargePoint in 2026

ChargePoint has seen severe share-price deterioration (roughly -70% in 2025 and -99% over five years) and reported 2025 revenue of $106 million with a net loss of $52.5 million, facing slowing EV demand after the expiration of tax credits. Cipher Mining has pivoted from pure crypto mining to leasing AI/data-center infrastructure, signing long-term deals including a 15-year, $5.5 billion agreement with AWS (300 MW of its 3.4 GW pipeline) and is positioning for potential profitability in 2026 as recurring revenue ramps and additional gigawatts come online.

Analysis

Market structure: Cipher (CIFR/CIFRW) and cloud/data‑center landlords (AMZN as tenant, NVDA enabling hardware) are the beneficiaries of a multi‑GW AI power buildout; ChargePoint (CHPT) and commodity EV charger suppliers face secular demand compression after EV tax‑credit rollbacks. Long‑term take‑or‑pay leases (e.g., CIFR’s 15‑year AWS deal) create annuity‑like ARR and pricing power for capacity providers while charging hardware becomes commoditized, compressing CHPT’s margin leverage. Cross‑asset: sustained AI power demand should bid power and natural gas prices (+5–15% regional risk) and widen credit spreads for cash‑burning EV names, while lifting implied volatility in CIFR/CHPT options. Risk assessment: Key tail risks are regulatory action vs. crypto mining or grid curtailment, large GPU shortages delaying tenant deployments, and contract repudiation or force majeure on long leases; each would materially hit CIFR within 6–18 months. Short horizon (days–weeks) noise will come from earnings and contract cadence; medium (quarters) depends on MW ramp and ARR conversion; long horizon (2026+) hinges on CIFR achieving positive net earnings and CHPT restoring consistent >20% revenue growth. Hidden dependency: CIFR’s near‑term cash still tied to crypto cycles until leases fully ramp, so shale‑like cyclicity remains. Trade implications: Direct tactical plays favor selective, sized longs in CIFR (or defined‑risk call spreads) and shorts/puts on CHPT; prefer NVDA exposure over pure EV hardware for secular AI capture. Use pair trades (long CIFR / short CHPT) to isolate AI vs EV infrastructure beta; tranche entry over 6–12 weeks ahead of quarterly data. Options: buy medium/long‑dated CIFR call spreads (12–18 months) and buy CHPT puts (3–6 months) to exploit asymmetric outcomes. Contrarian angles: Consensus overlooks execution and electricity cost risk for CIFR — conversion of 3.4 GW to contracted revenue requires rapid capex and interconnection windows; failure would compress any valuation premia. Conversely, CHPT may be oversold to the point of M&A interest by strategic oligopolists (EV OEM, utility), creating a binary upside; historical parallel: successful REIT conversions (Digital Realty) validate landlord thesis but many infrastructure pivots fail if capital intensity spikes.