Back to News
Market Impact: 0.55

Guess What Asset Has Performed Well During the War in Iran? Believe It or Not—It’s Bitcoin

Geopolitics & WarCrypto & Digital AssetsEnergy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsMarket Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCurrency & FXMonetary Policy
Guess What Asset Has Performed Well During the War in Iran? Believe It or Not—It’s Bitcoin

Bitcoin has risen about 10% to above $72,000 since the initial strikes on Iran, outperforming gold, the U.S. dollar and major U.S. indexes; net inflows into bitcoin funds (IBTC, FBTC) exceeded $1.1 billion per Farside Investors. The move comes amid higher oil prices and equity volatility; academic research finds bitcoin can show "remarkable stability" in some crises but is not a consistent safe haven, and central banks remain focused on gold rather than bitcoin.

Analysis

Bitcoin’s recent bid looks less like a permanent re-definition of its role and more like a liquidity-and-onramp-driven short-term refuge: 24/7 trading, US spot ETF minting, and quickly reallocated risk budgets allow capital to move into crypto faster than into physical gold or central-bank channels. That speed creates a transient decoupling from equities correlation—useful over days-to-weeks—but it is fragile because it is flow-dependent rather than balance-sheet backed. Second-order stressors work against a durable bull thesis. Higher energy prices and local supply-chain disruptions increase marginal costs for miners that rely on diesel or spot power, raising incentives to monetize holdings and potentially flip a short-term rally into realized supply if power-cost dynamics worsen over 1–3 months. At the same time, derivatives market structure (perp funding, concentrated AP activity in ETFs, and option skew) means a spike in funding or a run on redemptions can produce nonlinear moves and liquidity gaps overnight. Tail risks that would reverse the move include a coordinated regulatory push (US custodial rules, tax changes, or a crackdown on ETFs), a sharp dollar re-anchoring driven by Fed surprise tightening, or a global risk-off that forces cross-asset deleveraging. Tactically, treat exposure as a macro contingent allocation: size small, prefer defined-risk vehicles, and hedge crypto-specific operational risks rather than rely on historical correlations staying intact over months to years.