Back to News
Market Impact: 0.34

Elon Musk Says He Warned Donald Trump To Drop Tariffs Over Fears of Job Losses: 'President Loves Tariffs, I've Tried To Dissuade Him'

TSLA
Tax & TariffsTrade Policy & Supply ChainEconomic DataElections & Domestic PoliticsAutomotive & EVRegulation & LegislationCompany Fundamentals
Elon Musk Says He Warned Donald Trump To Drop Tariffs Over Fears of Job Losses: 'President Loves Tariffs, I've Tried To Dissuade Him'

Elon Musk said he failed to convince President Trump to hold back on tariffs, warning they could distort markets, raise consumer prices and risk a recession; Tesla recently paused orders for certain models in China facing a retaliatory 125% tariff. U.S. manufacturers blame the tariffs for industry contraction and job cuts — BLS data show a loss of 6,000 manufacturing jobs in October and 59,000 since April — signaling continued downside risk to automakers, exporters and cyclical industrials if tariffs remain in place.

Analysis

Market structure: Tariffs act as a classic transfer from downstream manufacturers/consumers to upstream commodity and materials producers. Winners: domestic steel/aluminum producers (NUE, STLD, XME) and any US-based input suppliers that can raise prices; Losers: export-exposed OEMs and China-dependent supply-chain assemblers (TSLA, F, GM) facing demand destruction and margin squeeze from higher input costs and retaliatory tariffs (article cites a 125% retaliatory tariff and ~59,000 manufacturing jobs lost since April). Cross-asset impact: material prices likely to rise near-term (supporting basic materials equities and selective commodity beta), equity volatility to increase for autos, FX flows into USD safe-haven and mixed bond response depending on incoming CPI prints. Risk assessment: Tail risks include escalation to broad-based global tariffs leading to a >1% GDP shock in 6-18 months or China imposing automotive bans that remove a material revenue pool for US EV makers. Time horizons separate into immediate (days: order cancellations and headline volatility), short (3–6 months: quarterly earnings margin hits), and long (12–36 months: supply-chain reshoring capex and permanent cost structure shifts). Hidden dependencies include inventory buffers, localized manufacturing footprints in China vs US, and FX moves that can partially offset tariffs. Catalysts: USTR rulings, monthly CPI prints, China retaliatory measures, and November 2025 election rhetoric. Trade implications: Tactical bias is long selective materials and inflation protection, short/hedge auto exposure with concentrated China revenue. Use options to control asymmetric risk: buy puts or put spreads on TSLA/large OEMs ahead of next quarterly prints while owning physical or leveraged exposure to materials via NUE/STLD or XME for 3–12 months. Monitor short interest and implied vols; if IV jumps >30% relative to historical 90-day, favor buying protection. Contrarian angles: Consensus underestimates that some domestic suppliers are already priced for modest tariff wins; conversely the market may be underpricing Tesla’s operational elasticity—localized China production and price cuts could blunt tariff impact, making an outright TSLA equity short risky near-term. Historical parallel: early-2000s steel tariffs produced short-lived producer gains followed by capacity expansion and margin normalization within 18–36 months. Unintended consequence: sustained tariffs can accelerate competitors’ vertical integration in China, permanently disadvantaging US brands over multiple years.