Back to News
Market Impact: 0.35

Analysts predict ‘fewer but better’ Gulf IPOs in 2026

UBS
IPOs & SPACsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningEmerging MarketsBanking & LiquidityGeopolitics & WarRegulation & LegislationMarket Technicals & FlowsDerivatives & Volatility
Analysts predict ‘fewer but better’ Gulf IPOs in 2026

Gulf IPO activity cooled sharply in 2025 with 44 listings raising $6.0bn (the lowest annual total since 2020) versus $12.9bn in 2024, and several 2025 IPOs trading below their flotation price. Analysts expect fewer but higher‑quality listings in 2026 — potential deals include Dubai Investment Park, Oman India Fertiliser, and possible listings from Etihad and Binghatti — as investors become more selective, valuations tighten and the UAE is forecast to outperform regionally while Saudi activity may recover in H2 and Oman/Kuwait could benefit from reforms and privatisations.

Analysis

Market structure: Fewer IPOs in 2026 means winners will be high-quality issuers, large ECM banks, and liquid UAE large-caps; losers are marginal developers and small-cap issuers who priced for a seller’s market. Expect buyer pricing power—discounts to market multiples will be a gating factor and raise post-listing performance for conservatively priced deals within 6–12 months. Risk assessment: Tail risks include a renewed Gulf conflict or a sudden sovereign bond sale that could compress foreign flows; probability low-to-moderate but impact high (10–25% equity sell-off). Near-term (days–weeks) volatility will spike around geopolitical headlines; medium-term (H1 2026) the IPO calendar and rate path drive flows; long-term (2026–27) a quality-driven re-rating in UAE banks and select privatizations is probable. Trade implications: Tactical overweight in UAE large-cap banks and ECM-fee beneficiaries, and underweight speculative Dubai real-estate small caps, is warranted; use cost-limited option hedges into H1 2026. Pair trades that long ADX banks vs. short recent underperforming UAE IPOs should capture the quality premium; increase Saudi exposure only after H1 2026 stabilization. Contrarian angle: Consensus underestimates scarcity premium—fewer listings can bid up high-quality secondary supply (10–20% upside potential for top-tier issuers). Historical parallels: post-2020 quiet windows produced concentrated rallies; unintended consequence: fee concentration to Big Banks (UBS, regional brokers) which benefits ECM franchises but raises systemic single-name liquidity risk.