Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

3 ways the pros are trading, including why one manager continues to back European defense stocks

Analyst InsightsMarket Technicals & FlowsInfrastructure & DefenseEmerging MarketsIPOs & SPACsPrivate Markets & VentureCurrency & FXCompany FundamentalsHealthcare & BiotechTechnology & Innovation
3 ways the pros are trading, including why one manager continues to back European defense stocks

Strategists highlighted three relative-value opportunities: European equities seen with about 5% upside, select European sectors trading at 20% to 25% discounts to fair value, and emerging markets benefiting from a sharp improvement in fundamentals. Defense spending is described as a 10- to 15-year mega trend, while weaker U.S. dollar conditions are aiding European companies. The piece is largely constructive commentary rather than a catalyst-driven market event, with IPO activity and private-market allocation also flagged as portfolio themes.

Analysis

The market setup favors a rotation from crowded U.S. large-cap leadership into cheaper, policy-sensitive cyclicals and ex-U.S. beta. The key second-order effect is that dollar weakness does not just help translated earnings in Europe; it also tightens financial conditions less for foreign borrowers and improves the relative attractiveness of non-U.S. assets to global allocators, which can create a self-reinforcing flow backdrop over the next 1-3 months. Europe’s opportunity is less about a broad index rerating and more about dispersion. Defense and healthcare offer different catalysts: defense has a multi-year backlog/CapEx cycle with low cancellation risk, while healthcare is a valuation catch-up trade that can work even if growth stays modest. The underappreciated risk is that if the dollar stabilizes or U.S. growth re-accelerates, this trade likely compresses first through multiple expansion rather than earnings, so entry discipline matters more than the thematic story. Emerging markets may be at the earliest stage of a mean-reversion regime, but the more important tell is positioning: after years of underownership, even modest inflows can have outsized price impact because liquidity is thinner and local markets are more rate-sensitive. The contrarian read is that consensus is still treating EM as a GDP story, when the cleaner trade is a liquidity/ownership reset; that argues for a basket approach rather than single-country macro bets. IPO enthusiasm is a separate but related signal: risk capital is returning, which could support private assets and high-duration growth, but it also raises the chance that public-market incumbents face valuation pressure from new issuance and capital allocation shifts.